BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23554145)

  • 1. Differences in recovery of left and right ventricular function following aortic valve interventions: a longitudinal echocardiographic study in patients undergoing surgical, transapical or transfemoral aortic valve implantation.
    Forsberg LM; Tamás É; Vánky F; Engvall J; Nylander E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1004-14. PubMed ID: 23554145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left and right ventricular function in aortic stenosis patients 8 weeks post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Forsberg LM; Tamás E; Vánky F; Nielsen NE; Engvall J; Nylander E
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2011 Aug; 12(8):603-11. PubMed ID: 21705353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic stenosis: right and left ventricular function in the early postprocedural phase. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation.
    Quick S; Speiser U; Pfluecke C; Youssef A; Sveric K; Strasser R; Ibrahim K
    Acta Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 68(6):583-9. PubMed ID: 24579436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right ventricular function after aortic valve replacement: a pilot study comparing surgical and transcatheter procedures using 3D echocardiography.
    Keyl C; Schneider J; Beyersdorf F; Ruile P; Siepe M; Pioch K; Schneider R; Jander N
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 49(3):966-71. PubMed ID: 26130077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid-term deaths.
    Ando T; Takagi H; Grines CL
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Sep; 25(3):484-492. PubMed ID: 28549125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation--early recovery of left and preservation of right ventricular function.
    Zhao Y; Lindqvist P; Nilsson J; Holmgren A; Näslund U; Henein MY
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Jan; 12(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 20956401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Clavel MA; Webb JG; Rodés-Cabau J; Masson JB; Dumont E; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Bergeron S; Baumgartner H; Burwash IG; Dumesnil JG; Mundigler G; Moss R; Kempny A; Bagur R; Bergler-Klein J; Gurvitch R; Mathieu P; Pibarot P
    Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(19):1928-36. PubMed ID: 20975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis: complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany.
    Möllmann H; Bestehorn K; Bestehorn M; Papoutsis K; Fleck E; Ertl G; Kuck KH; Hamm C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 105(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26830097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health-related quality-of-life after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Rex CE; Heiberg J; Klaaborg KE; Hjortdal VE
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2016; 50(5-6):377-382. PubMed ID: 27615712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfemoral versus Transapical Aortic Implantation for Aortic Stenosis Based on No Significant Difference in Logistic EuroSCORE: A Meta-Analysis.
    Liu Z; He R; Wu C; Xia Y
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 26121378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Results of the OBSERVANT study: clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of the enrolled population treated with transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation].
    D'Errigo P; Barbanti M; Santini F; Grossi C; Ranucci M; Onorati F; Covello RD; Rosato S; Tamburino C; Santoro G; Fusco D; Seccareccia F;
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2014 Mar; 15(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 24770431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).
    Généreux P; Cohen DJ; Williams MR; Mack M; Kodali SK; Svensson LG; Kirtane AJ; Xu K; McAndrew TC; Makkar R; Smith CR; Leon MB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(11):1100-9. PubMed ID: 24291283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.
    Onorati F; D'Errigo P; Grossi C; Barbanti M; Ranucci M; Covello DR; Rosato S; Maraschini A; Santoro G; Tamburino C; Seccareccia F; Santini F; Menicanti L;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 24263007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life in high-risk patients: comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Amonn K; Stortecky S; Brinks H; Gahl B; Windecker S; Wenaweser P; Carrel T; Huber C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jan; 43(1):34-41; discussion 41-2. PubMed ID: 22531274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery.
    Papadopoulos N; Ilioska P; Fichtlscherer S; Lehmann R; Beiras Fernandez A; Moritz A; Doss M; Zierer A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 97(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 24075497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights on clinical outcomes, prognostic markers, and functional status changes.
    Mok M; Nombela-Franco L; Dumont E; Urena M; DeLarochellière R; Doyle D; Villeneuve J; Côté M; Ribeiro HB; Allende R; Laflamme J; DeLarochellière H; Laflamme L; Amat-Santos I; Pibarot P; Maltais F; Rodés-Cabau J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1072-84. PubMed ID: 24156967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Fairbairn TA; Steadman CD; Mather AN; Motwani M; Blackman DJ; Plein S; McCann GP; Greenwood JP
    Heart; 2013 Aug; 99(16):1185-91. PubMed ID: 23749779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.
    Abdul-Jawad Altisent O; Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Marsal JR; Ribera A; Auger C; Ortega G; Cascant P; Urena M; Del Blanco BG; Serra V; Sureda C; Igual A; Rovira A; González-Alujas MT; Gonzalez A; Puri R; Cuellar H; Tornos P; Rodés-Cabau J; Garcia-Dorado D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 105(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 26646556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional left ventricular function after transapical vs. transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation analysed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Meyer CG; Frick M; Lotfi S; Altiok E; Koos R; Kirschfink A; Lehrke M; Autschbach R; Hoffmann R
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Oct; 15(10):1168-76. PubMed ID: 24906997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study.
    D'Errigo P; Barbanti M; Ranucci M; Onorati F; Covello RD; Rosato S; Tamburino C; Santini F; Santoro G; Seccareccia F;
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(5):1945-52. PubMed ID: 22633667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.