200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23555083)
1. Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.
Evangelidou P; Alexandrou A; Moutafi M; Ioannides M; Antoniou P; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Velissariou V; Sismani C; Patsalis PC
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():346762. PubMed ID: 23555083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations.
Evangelidou P; Sismani C; Ioannides M; Christodoulou C; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Georgiou I; Velissariou V; Patsalis PC
Mol Cytogenet; 2010 Nov; 3():24. PubMed ID: 21110858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study.
Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Applied research of combined G-banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses].
Fu W; Lu J; Xu L; Zheng L; Zhang Y; Zhong Y; Wang Y; Jin Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 31(6):737-42. PubMed ID: 25449078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of chromosomal karyotyping analysis and array CGH for fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonography].
Wang Y; Tang B; Guo L; Chen H; Lu J; Yin A
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 34(4):550-553. PubMed ID: 28777857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.
Kan AS; Lau ET; Tang WF; Chan SS; Ding SC; Chan KY; Lee CP; Hui PW; Chung BH; Leung KY; Ma T; Leung WC; Tang MH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87988. PubMed ID: 24505343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Karyotype versus genomic hybridization for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: a metaanalysis.
Saldarriaga W; García-Perdomo HA; Arango-Pineda J; Fonseca J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):330.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25305409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling.
Patel A
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():171-186. PubMed ID: 30506198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array-CGH increased the diagnostic rate of developmental delay or intellectual disability in Taiwan.
Lee CL; Lee CH; Chuang CK; Chiu HC; Chen YJ; Chou CL; Wu PS; Chen CP; Lin HY; Lin SP
Pediatr Neonatol; 2019 Aug; 60(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 30581099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?
Bejjani BA; Saleki R; Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Theisen A; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG
Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Apr; 134(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15723295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Genomic abnormalities in children with mental retardation and autism: the use of comparative genomic hybridization in situ (HRCGH) and molecular karyotyping with DNA-microchips (array CGH)].
Vorsanova SG; Iurov IIu; Kurinnaia OS; Voinova VIu; Iurov IuB
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2013; 113(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 24077551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.
Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH
BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis.
Lichtenbelt KD; Knoers NV; Schuring-Blom GH
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):241-50. PubMed ID: 22086062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspective on the technical challenges involved in the implementation of array-CGH in prenatal diagnostic testing.
Callaway JL; Huang S; Karampetsou E; Crolla JA
Mol Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 56(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 24146428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
