These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23555083)

  • 1. Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.
    Evangelidou P; Alexandrou A; Moutafi M; Ioannides M; Antoniou P; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Velissariou V; Sismani C; Patsalis PC
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():346762. PubMed ID: 23555083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations.
    Evangelidou P; Sismani C; Ioannides M; Christodoulou C; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Georgiou I; Velissariou V; Patsalis PC
    Mol Cytogenet; 2010 Nov; 3():24. PubMed ID: 21110858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study.
    Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
    Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Applied research of combined G-banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses].
    Fu W; Lu J; Xu L; Zheng L; Zhang Y; Zhong Y; Wang Y; Jin Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 31(6):737-42. PubMed ID: 25449078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
    Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
    BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of chromosomal karyotyping analysis and array CGH for fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonography].
    Wang Y; Tang B; Guo L; Chen H; Lu J; Yin A
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 34(4):550-553. PubMed ID: 28777857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.
    Kan AS; Lau ET; Tang WF; Chan SS; Ding SC; Chan KY; Lee CP; Hui PW; Chung BH; Leung KY; Ma T; Leung WC; Tang MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87988. PubMed ID: 24505343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
    Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Karyotype versus genomic hybridization for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: a metaanalysis.
    Saldarriaga W; García-Perdomo HA; Arango-Pineda J; Fonseca J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):330.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25305409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling.
    Patel A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():171-186. PubMed ID: 30506198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Array-CGH increased the diagnostic rate of developmental delay or intellectual disability in Taiwan.
    Lee CL; Lee CH; Chuang CK; Chiu HC; Chen YJ; Chou CL; Wu PS; Chen CP; Lin HY; Lin SP
    Pediatr Neonatol; 2019 Aug; 60(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 30581099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?
    Bejjani BA; Saleki R; Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Theisen A; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG
    Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Apr; 134(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15723295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Genomic abnormalities in children with mental retardation and autism: the use of comparative genomic hybridization in situ (HRCGH) and molecular karyotyping with DNA-microchips (array CGH)].
    Vorsanova SG; Iurov IIu; Kurinnaia OS; Voinova VIu; Iurov IuB
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2013; 113(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 24077551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.
    Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH
    BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis.
    Lichtenbelt KD; Knoers NV; Schuring-Blom GH
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):241-50. PubMed ID: 22086062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
    Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspective on the technical challenges involved in the implementation of array-CGH in prenatal diagnostic testing.
    Callaway JL; Huang S; Karampetsou E; Crolla JA
    Mol Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 56(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 24146428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.