154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23555169)
1. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.
Tsou YK; Lien JM; Chen CK; Lin CH; Chen HY; Lee MS
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 19(11):1805-10. PubMed ID: 23555169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: how do day 1 and day 2 results compare?
Bechtold ML; Holly JS; Thaler K; Marshall JB
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 13(30):4091-5. PubMed ID: 17696227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symptoms, endoscopic findings and reflux monitoring results in candidates for bariatric surgery.
Heimgartner B; Herzig M; Borbély Y; Kröll D; Nett P; Tutuian R
Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Jul; 49(7):750-756. PubMed ID: 28302442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of reflux esophagitis on the esophageal function before and after laparoscopic fundoplication.
Hoshino M; Omura N; Yano F; Tsuboi K; Yamamoto SR; Akimoto S; Masuda T; Kashiwagi H; Yanaga K
Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 15(4):224-230. PubMed ID: 30225739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodality evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms who have failed empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.
Galindo G; Vassalle J; Marcus SN; Triadafilopoulos G
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Jul; 26(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 22862422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Pattern is Distinct in Patients With Extraesophageal Reflux Symptoms and Pathologic Acid Reflux.
Kavitt RT; Lal P; Yuksel ES; Ates F; Slaughter JC; Garrett CG; Higginbotham T; Vaezi MF
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):347-351. PubMed ID: 27495970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Esophageal function tests are not helpful in symptoms suspicious of extraesophageal reflux - a prospective study in 74 patients.
Frieling T; Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R; Weingardt C; Heise J; Kreysel C; Blank M; Müller D
Z Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 27612219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcutaneous cervical esophagus ultrasound in adults: relation with ambulatory 24-h pH-monitoring and esophageal manometry.
Kacar S; Uysal S; Kuran S; Dagli U; Ozin Y; Karabulut E; Sasmaz N
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Oct; 13(39):5245-52. PubMed ID: 17876896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, capsule pH monitoring, combined pH monitoring with multichannel impedance, esophageal manometry, radiology and scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux disease?
Vardar R; Keskin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 28(Suppl 1):S16-S21. PubMed ID: 29199161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharyngeal pH monitoring better predicts a successful outcome for extraesophageal reflux symptoms after antireflux surgery.
Worrell SG; DeMeester SR; Greene CL; Oh DS; Hagen JA
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4113-8. PubMed ID: 23836124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.
Ravi A; Gunasekaran T; Berman J
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Jan; 62(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 26196198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does deep sedation impact the results of 48 hours catheterless pH testing?
Korrapati V; Babich JP; Balani A; Grendell JH; Kongara KR
World J Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 17(10):1304-7. PubMed ID: 21455329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective study examining the impact of multichannel intraluminal impedance on antireflux surgery.
Gruebel C; Linke G; Tutuian R; Hebbard G; Zerz A; Meyenberger C; Borovicka J
Surg Endosc; 2008 May; 22(5):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17943361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?
de Bortoli N; Nacci A; Savarino E; Martinucci I; Bellini M; Fattori B; Ceccarelli L; Costa F; Mumolo MG; Ricchiuti A; Savarino V; Berrettini S; Marchi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4363-70. PubMed ID: 22969200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in manometry and 24-H ambulatory pH-metry between patients with and without endoscopic or histological esophagitis in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Kasapidis P; Xynos E; Mantides A; Chrysos E; Demonakou M; Nikolopoulos N; Vassilakis JS
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Nov; 88(11):1893-9. PubMed ID: 8237938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of impedance monitoring in patients with extraesophageal symptoms.
Kavitt RT; Yuksel ES; Slaughter JC; Garrett CG; Hagaman D; Higginbotham T; Vaezi MF
Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2463-8. PubMed ID: 23857711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
