217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556238)
1. Measuring in-use ship emissions with international and U.S. federal methods.
Khan MY; Ranganathan S; Agrawal H; Welch WA; Laroo C; Miller JW; Cocker DR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Mar; 63(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 23556238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of emission control technologies for auxiliary engines on ocean-going vessels.
Jayaram V; Nigam A; Welch WA; Miller JW; Cocker DR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Jan; 61(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 21305884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nitrogen oxide emission calculation for post-Panamax container ships by using engine operation power probability as weighting factor: A slow-steaming case.
Cheng CW; Hua J; Hwang DS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Jun; 68(6):588-597. PubMed ID: 29215965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emission factors of particulate and gaseous compounds from a large cargo vessel operated under real-world conditions.
Huang C; Hu Q; Wang H; Qiao L; Jing S; Wang H; Zhou M; Zhu S; Ma Y; Lou S; Li L; Tao S; Li Y; Lou D
Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt A):667-674. PubMed ID: 30025340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study on the real-world emission characteristics of gaseous and particulate pollutants from an inland ship using a portable emission measurement system.
Zhang Y; Zhao K; Lou D; Fang L
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Nov; 184():114205. PubMed ID: 36242798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Particle emissions from ships: dependence on fuel type.
Winnes H; Fridell E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Dec; 59(12):1391-8. PubMed ID: 20066904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chemical characterization of exhaust emissions from selected canadian marine vessels: the case of trace metals and lanthanoids.
Celo V; Dabek-Zlotorzynska E; McCurdy M
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5220-6. PubMed ID: 25825794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cold start on engine performance and emissions from diesel engines using IMO-Compliant distillate fuels.
Chu Van T; Zare A; Jafari M; Bodisco TA; Surawski N; Verma P; Suara K; Ristovski Z; Rainey T; Stevanovic S; Brown RJ
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 2):113260. PubMed ID: 31622808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of real-world and certification emission rates for light duty gasoline vehicles.
Khan T; Frey HC
Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 622-623():790-800. PubMed ID: 29223906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis and measurement of SOx, CO
Murcia González JC
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(6):374. PubMed ID: 34061261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-world emissions of in-use off-road vehicles in Mexico.
Zavala M; Huertas JI; Prato D; Jazcilevich A; Aguilar A; Balam M; Misra C; Molina LT
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):958-972. PubMed ID: 28379119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NO
Cheng CW; Hua J; Hwang DS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Oct; 67(10):1146-1157. PubMed ID: 28722541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change.
Campbell P; Zhang Y; Yan F; Lu Z; Streets D
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():918-930. PubMed ID: 29684896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of flexible fuel vehicle and life-cycle fuel consumption and emissions of selected pollutants and greenhouse gases for ethanol 85 versus gasoline.
Zhai H; Frey HC; Rouphail NM; Gonçalves GA; Farias TL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Aug; 59(8):912-24. PubMed ID: 19728485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-Plume Emission Test Stand 2: emission factors for 10- to 100-kW U.S. military generators.
Zhu D; Nussbaum NJ; Kuhns HD; Chang MC; Sodeman D; Uppapalli S; Moosmüller H; Chow JC; Watson JG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Dec; 59(12):1446-57. PubMed ID: 20066910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and comparison of portable emissions measurement systems and federal reference methods for emissions from a back-up generator and a diesel truck operated on a chassis dynamometer.
Durbin TD; Johnson K; Cocker DR; Miller JW; Maldonado H; Shah A; Ensfield C; Weaver C; Akard M; Harvey N; Symon J; Lanni T; Bachalo WD; Payne G; Smallwood G; Linke M
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6199-204. PubMed ID: 17937302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Idle emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: review and recent data.
Khan AB; Clark NN; Thompson GJ; Wayne WS; Gautam M; Lyons DW; Hawelti D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Oct; 56(10):1404-19. PubMed ID: 17063863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes.
Ammar NR; Seddiek IS
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(18):23342-23355. PubMed ID: 32338322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NOx Emissions Control Area (NECA) scenario for ports in the North Adriatic Sea.
Topic T; Murphy AJ; Pazouki K; Norman R
J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118712. PubMed ID: 37573694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greenhouse gas and criteria emission benefits through reduction of vessel speed at sea.
Khan MY; Agrawal H; Ranganathan S; Welch WA; Miller JW; Cocker DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(22):12600-7. PubMed ID: 22974075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
