227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556603)
1. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
Brungart DS; Iyer N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Jin SH
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
Li X; Jeng FC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.
Prodi N; Visentin C; Feletti A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
