143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556607)
1. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
Jackson HM; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1225. PubMed ID: 25190396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants.
Lunner T; Hietkamp RK; Andersen MR; Hopkins K; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22246137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release.
Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1140-53. PubMed ID: 18247914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
