These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556692)

  • 41. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of a consistent target or masker voice on target speech intelligibility in two- and three-talker mixtures.
    Samson F; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 27036241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of spatial and temporal integration of a single early reflection on speech intelligibility.
    Warzybok A; Rennies J; Brand T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):269-82. PubMed ID: 23297901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
    Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz J; Dillon H; Best V; Hickson L; Cameron S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2937-45. PubMed ID: 24116429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
    Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Voice-associated static face image releases speech from informational masking.
    Gao Y; Cao S; Qu T; Wu X; Li H; Zhang J; Li L
    Psych J; 2014 Jun; 3(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 26271763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.