These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556693)

  • 1. Inner speech captures the perception of external speech.
    Scott M; Yeung HH; Gick B; Werker JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL286-92. PubMed ID: 23556693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corollary discharge provides the sensory content of inner speech.
    Scott M
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 23846719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning.
    Shiller DM; Sato M; Gracco VL; Baum SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1103-13. PubMed ID: 19206885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error biases in inner and overt speech: evidence from tongue twisters.
    Corley M; Brocklehurst PH; Moat HS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):162-75. PubMed ID: 21244112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception in individuals with auditory dys-synchrony.
    Kumar UA; Jayaram M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Mar; 125(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 20883593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex.
    Yrttiaho S; Alku P; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3177-85. PubMed ID: 19425660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct Mechanisms of Imagery Differentially Influence Speech Perception.
    Ma 马欧 O; Tian 田兴 X
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 31481396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The perceptual organization of sine-wave speech under competitive conditions.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):804-17. PubMed ID: 20707450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech.
    Easwar V; Glista D; Purcell DW; Scollie SD
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):926-31. PubMed ID: 22916693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing faces: how the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears.
    Bristow D; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Mattout J; Soares C; Gliga T; Baillet S; Mangin JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):905-21. PubMed ID: 18702595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical processing of degraded speech sounds: effects of distortion type and continuity.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Yrttiaho S; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):1036-45. PubMed ID: 22289805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds.
    Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiologic acoustic basis of speech perception.
    Angelo R
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1985 May; 18(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 2989756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perception of intonation questions and statements in Cantonese.
    Ma JK; Ciocca V; Whitehill TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):1012-23. PubMed ID: 21361457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.