BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556842)

  • 1. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes.
    Rezvanpour A; Roostaazad R; Hesampour M; Nyström M; Ghotbi C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1216-24. PubMed ID: 18539388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of salt concentration and foulant surface charge on hydrocarbon fouling of a poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membrane.
    He Z; Kasemset S; Kirschner AY; Cheng YH; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 117():230-241. PubMed ID: 28412584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation of water from metal working emulsions by ultrafiltration using vibratory membranes.
    Moulai-Mostefa N; Frappart M; Akoum O; Ding L; Jaffrin MY
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):978-82. PubMed ID: 20097000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
    Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of fouling formation in membrane ultrafiltration by ultrasound irradiation.
    Naddeo V; Belgiorno V; Borea L; Secondes MF; Ballesteros F
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(9-12):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25384626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration.
    Broens F; Menne D; Pothof I; Blankert B; Roesink HD; Futselaar H; Lammertink RG; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1113-20. PubMed ID: 22227242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harvesting microalgal biomass using crossflow membrane filtration: critical flux, filtration performance, and fouling characterization.
    Elcik H; Cakmakci M
    Environ Technol; 2017 Jun; 38(12):1585-1596. PubMed ID: 27666399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carbon nanotube blended polyethersulfone membranes for fouling control in water treatment.
    Celik E; Park H; Choi H; Choi H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):274-82. PubMed ID: 20716459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fouling behavior of typical organic foulants in polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: characterization from microforces.
    Wang L; Miao R; Wang X; Lv Y; Meng X; Yang Y; Huang D; Feng L; Liu Z; Ju K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(8):3708-14. PubMed ID: 23528200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling by particles: effect of ultrasonic factors.
    Chen D; Weavers LK; Walker HW
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2006 Jul; 13(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 16162417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical flux investigation in treating o/w emulsion by TiO
    Yi X; Wang Y; Jin L; Shi W
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 76(9-10):2785-2792. PubMed ID: 29168718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound irradiation combined with hydraulic cleaning on fouled polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes.
    Wan MW; Reguyal F; Futalan C; Yang HL; Kan CC
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(21-24):2929-37. PubMed ID: 24617052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biofilm increases permeate quality by organic carbon degradation in low pressure ultrafiltration.
    Chomiak A; Traber J; Morgenroth E; Derlon N
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 85():512-20. PubMed ID: 26386342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Meylan S; Boller M
    Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1713-22. PubMed ID: 17346766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of ceramic membrane and compressed air-assisted solvent extraction (CASX) for metal recovery.
    Li CW; Chiu CH; Lee YC; Chang CH; Lee YH; Chen YM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1274-80. PubMed ID: 20861540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.