374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556874)
1. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy dose distributions with iridium-192, ytterbium-169, and thulium-170 sources.
Krishnamurthy D; Weinberg V; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 21397569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric equivalence of nonstandard HDR brachytherapy catheter patterns.
Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 19235391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Georg D; Hopfgartner J; Gòra J; Kuess P; Kragl G; Berger D; Hegazy N; Goldner G; Georg P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 24521685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. IPIP: A new approach to inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy by directly optimizing dosimetric indices.
Siauw T; Cunha A; Atamtürk A; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Goldberg K
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4045-51. PubMed ID: 21859003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of edema, relative biological effectiveness, and dose heterogeneity on prostate brachytherapy.
Wang JZ; Mayr NA; Nag S; Montebello J; Gupta N; Samsami N; Kanellitsas C
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 16696479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Kunogi H; Cunha JAM; Chang AJ; Gadzinski AJ; Shinohara K; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 28869143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class solution for inversely planned permanent prostate implants to mimic an experienced dosimetrist.
Lessard E; Kwa SL; Pickett B; Roach M; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2773-82. PubMed ID: 16964853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial.
Major T; Polgár C; Jorgo K; Stelczer G; Ágoston P
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28325472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
