312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556885)
1. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A TCP model incorporating setup uncertainty and tumor cell density variation in microscopic extension to guide treatment planning.
Jin JY; Kong FM; Liu D; Ren L; Li H; Zhong H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):439-48. PubMed ID: 21361212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of microscopic disease on the tumor control probability in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Siedschlag C; Boersma L; van Loon J; Rossi M; van Baardwijk A; Gilhuijs K; Stroom J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 21955665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1407-22. PubMed ID: 11955756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined recipe for clinical target volume and planning target volume margins.
Stroom J; Gilhuijs K; Vieira S; Chen W; Salguero J; Moser E; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24113058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
Song W; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.
Giżyńska MK; Kukołowicz PF; Heijmen BJM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 31721232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions.
Parker BC; Shiu AS; Maor MH; Lang FF; Liu HH; White RA; Antolak JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 12132939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
