328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556893)
1. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.
Sawakuchi GO; Mirkovic D; Perles LA; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Ciangaru G; Suzuki K; Gillin MT; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70. PubMed ID: 20964215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots.
Anand A; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Sawakuchi GO; Poenisch F; Amos RA; Ciangaru G; Titt U; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):891-900. PubMed ID: 22320798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.
Yagi M; Tsubouchi T; Hamatani N; Takashina M; Maruo H; Fujitaka S; Nihongi H; Ogawa K; Kanai T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268087. PubMed ID: 35536852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric impact of the low-dose envelope of scanned proton beams at a ProBeam facility: comparison of measurements with TPS and MC calculations.
Würl M; Englbrecht F; Parodi K; Hillbrand M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):958-73. PubMed ID: 26738626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
Palmans H; Symons JE; Denis JM; de Kock EA; Jones DT; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using field size factors to characterize the in-air fluence of a proton machine with a range shifter.
Shen J; Lentz JM; Hu Y; Liu W; Morales DH; Stoker JB; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):52. PubMed ID: 28288673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic film dosimetry of proton beams for depth-dose constancy check and beam profile measurement.
Yeo IJ; Teran A; Ghebremedhin A; Johnson M; Patyal B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5402. PubMed ID: 26103499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beam commissioning of the first compact proton therapy system with spot scanning and dynamic field collimation.
Vilches-Freixas G; Unipan M; Rinaldi I; Martens J; Roijen E; Almeida IP; Decabooter E; Bosmans G
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190598. PubMed ID: 31782941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
