These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23556896)
1. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography. Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach. Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection. Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms. Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms. Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system. Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice. Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices. Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer. Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software. Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification. Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms. Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]