These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23557227)

  • 1. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models.
    Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of the keratoconic cornea.
    Gefen A; Shalom R; Elad D; Mandel Y
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jul; 2(3):224-36. PubMed ID: 19627827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus.
    Wolffsohn JS; Safeen S; Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 22495031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.
    Saad A; Lteif Y; Azan E; Gatinel D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2912-6. PubMed ID: 20042662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical and optical behavior of human corneas before and after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sánchez P; Moutsouris K; Pandolfi A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):905-17. PubMed ID: 24857438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking from porcine eye inflation experiments.
    Kling S; Remon L; Pérez-Escudero A; Merayo-Lloves J; Marcos S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):3961-8. PubMed ID: 20335615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal biomechanical property measurement with an IOP loading method in keratoconic patients.
    Sergienko NM; Shargorodska IV
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Oct; 39(10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24654976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser.
    Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):129-32; quiz 151. PubMed ID: 19233712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.
    Ortiz D; Piñero D; Shabayek MH; Arnalich-Montiel F; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 17662426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.
    Feizi S; Einollahi B; Yazdani S; Hashemloo A
    Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 22357385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
    Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical Analysis of Wave-Front Aberrations Induced from Conventional Laser Refractive Surgery in a Biomechanical Finite Element Model.
    Fang L; Ma W; Wang Y; Dai Y; Fang Z
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 May; 61(5):34. PubMed ID: 32433759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the LASIK flap thickness on corneal biomechanical behavior: a finite element analysis.
    Fang L; Wang Y; Yang R; Deng S; Deng J; Wan L
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):67. PubMed ID: 32093676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal biomechanical changes after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; Barraquer RI; Michael R
    Cornea; 2012 May; 31(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 22314819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking.
    Vinciguerra P; Albè E; Mahmoud AM; Trazza S; Hafezi F; Roberts CJ
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 26(9):669-76. PubMed ID: 20438025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal Biomechanics in Unilateral Keratoconus and Fellow Eyes with a Scheimpflug-based Tonometer.
    Catalán-López S; Cadarso-Suárez L; López-Ratón M; Cadarso-Suárez C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 95(7):608-615. PubMed ID: 29957740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.