These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23557434)
1. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss. Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on short dental implants. Elangovan S; Mawardi HH; Karimbux NY J Periodontol; 2013 Jun; 84(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 22873652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review assessing the quality of reporting of risk factor research in implant dentistry using smoking, diabetes and periodontitis and implant loss as an outcome: critical aspects in design and outcome assessment. Rocchietta I; Nisand D J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():114-21. PubMed ID: 22533951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients. Karoussis IK; Kotsovilis S; Fourmousis I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 17868376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies. Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias assessment of systematic reviews regarding dental implant placement in smokers: An umbrella systematic review. de Oliveira-Neto OB; Barbosa FT; de Sousa-Rodrigues CF; de Lima FJC J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 29724548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal. Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding dental implant placement on diabetic patients: an overview of systematic reviews. de Oliveira-Neto OB; Santos IO; Barbosa FT; de Sousa-Rodrigues CF; de Lima FJ Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2019 Jul; 24(4):e483-e490. PubMed ID: 31232387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review. Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant therapy in partially edentulous, periodontally compromised patients: a review. Van der Weijden GA; van Bemmel KM; Renvert S J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 15842267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry. Faggion CM; Listl S; Giannakopoulos NN Vet J; 2012 May; 192(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21924652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR. Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination. Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews. Aziz T; Compton S; Nassar U; Matthews D; Ansari K; Flores-Mir C J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):263-78. PubMed ID: 23330989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans. Elangovan S; Avila-Ortiz G; Johnson GK; Karimbux N; Allareddy V J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 22509753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assessment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. Moraschini V; Luz D; Velloso G; Barboza EDP Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 46(6):774-781. PubMed ID: 28292550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care. Afshari A Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR. Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]