These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23557984)
41. Conflict of interests and evidence base for GM crops food/feed safety research. Sanchez MA Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 25658276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Safety assessment of foods derived from genetically modified plants]. Pöting A; Schauzu M Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Jun; 53(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 20449554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? Taylor SL; Hefle SL J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation. Craddock N Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event. Knudsen I; Poulsen M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Plant viruses versus RNAi: simple pathogens reveal complex insights on plant antimicrobial defense. Qu F Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA; 2010; 1(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 21956904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Are genetically modified plants useful and safe? Weil JH IUBMB Life; 2005; 57(4-5):311-4. PubMed ID: 16036615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms. Constable A; Jonas D; Cockburn A; Davi A; Edwards G; Hepburn P; Herouet-Guicheney C; Knowles M; Moseley B; Oberdörfer R; Samuels F Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2513-25. PubMed ID: 17692450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Genetically modified feeds in poultry diet: safety, performance, and product quality. Tufarelli V; Selvaggi M; Dario C; Laudadio V Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(4):562-9. PubMed ID: 24915369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Plants with stacked genetically modified events: to assess or not to assess? Kok EJ; Pedersen J; Onori R; Sowa S; Schauzu M; De Schrijver A; Teeri TH Trends Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 32(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 24418332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of GE food safety using '-omics' techniques and long-term animal feeding studies. Ricroch AE N Biotechnol; 2013 May; 30(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 23253614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Supervision of foods containing components of genetically modified organisms and the problems of labeling this type of products]. Onishchenko GG Gig Sanit; 2010; (4):4-8. PubMed ID: 20873382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Potential adverse health effects of genetically modified crops. Bakshi A J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 12746139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. RNA interference: a promising technique for the improvement of traditional crops. Katoch R; Thakur N Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2013 Mar; 64(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 22861122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. RNAi as a potential tool for biotechnological applications in fungi. Salame TM; Ziv C; Hadar Y; Yarden O Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Feb; 89(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 20953869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. RNAi-based GM plants: food for thought for risk assessors. Ramon M; Devos Y; Lanzoni A; Liu Y; Gomes A; Gennaro A; Waigmann E Plant Biotechnol J; 2014 Dec; 12(9):1271-3. PubMed ID: 25431203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]