273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23558341)
1. The branch-site test of positive selection is surprisingly robust but lacks power under synonymous substitution saturation and variation in GC.
Gharib WH; Robinson-Rechavi M
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23558341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
Yang Z; dos Reis M
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates.
Dunn KA; Kenney T; Gu H; Bielawski JP
BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30642241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-positive results obtained from the branch-site test of positive selection.
Suzuki Y
Genes Genet Syst; 2008 Aug; 83(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18931458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction between selection and biased gene conversion in mammalian protein-coding sequence evolution revealed by a phylogenetic covariance analysis.
Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 23024185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y
Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y; Gojobori T
Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
Pond SK; Muse SV
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites.
Wong WS; Yang Z; Goldman N; Nielsen R
Genetics; 2004 Oct; 168(2):1041-51. PubMed ID: 15514074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes.
Yang Z; Swanson WJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 11752189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of a mechanistic codon substitution model for evolutionary analysis of protein-coding sequences.
Miyazawa S
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28892. PubMed ID: 22220197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection.
Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):280-94. PubMed ID: 23595859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GC-biased gene conversion and selection affect GC content in the Oryza genus (rice).
Muyle A; Serres-Giardi L; Ressayre A; Escobar J; Glémin S
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2695-706. PubMed ID: 21504892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why time matters: codon evolution and the temporal dynamics of dN/dS.
Mugal CF; Wolf JB; Kaj I
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):212-31. PubMed ID: 24129904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.
Rodrigue N; Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 27744408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Phenotype-Genotype Codon Model for Detecting Adaptive Evolution.
Jones CT; Youssef N; Susko E; Bielawski JP
Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):722-738. PubMed ID: 31730199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
