These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23558352)

  • 1. On a closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 177(11):1314-6. PubMed ID: 23558352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doubly robust conditional logistic regression.
    Zetterqvist J; Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4749-4760. PubMed ID: 31373403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Funk MJ; Westreich D; Wiesen C; Stürmer T; Brookhart MA; Davidian M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):761-7. PubMed ID: 21385832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-robust estimation of an exposure-outcome odds ratio adjusting for confounding in cohort and case-control studies.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Rotnitzky A
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(4):335-47. PubMed ID: 21225896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parametric-Regression-Based Causal Mediation Analysis of Binary Outcomes and Binary Mediators: Moving Beyond the Rareness or Commonness of the Outcome.
    Samoilenko M; Lefebvre G
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 190(9):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 33693467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploiting gene-environment independence for analysis of case-control studies: an empirical Bayes-type shrinkage estimator to trade-off between bias and efficiency.
    Mukherjee B; Chatterjee N
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):685-694. PubMed ID: 18162111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.
    Loux TM; Drake C; Smith-Gagen J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):155-175. PubMed ID: 25006032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with a common outcome: a simple and efficient two-stage approach.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Int J Biostat; 2013 May; 9(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 23658213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brief Report: Doubly Robust Estimation of Standardized Risk Difference and Ratio in the Exposed Population.
    Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
    Epidemiology; 2015 Nov; 26(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 26275176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional validation sampling for consistent risk estimation with binary outcome data subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Farrell PJ; Krewski D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 30746841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.
    Bieler GS; Brown GG; Williams RL; Brogan DJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 20133516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
    Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inclusion of binary proxy variables in logistic regression improves treatment effect estimation in observational studies in the presence of binary unmeasured confounding variables.
    Rosenbaum C; Yu Q; Buzhardt S; Sutton E; Chapple AG
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(6):995-1015. PubMed ID: 37986712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.