These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2355854)

  • 1. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pattern recognition account of decision making.
    Massaro DW
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):616-27. PubMed ID: 7968557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conjunction fallacy?
    Wolford G; Taylor HA; Beck JR
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2314227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization.
    Rehder B
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 16686102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Slattery R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):168-78. PubMed ID: 16248496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners".
    Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI
    Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does typicality of category members affect the deductive reasoning? An ERP study.
    Lei Y; Li F; Long C; Li P; Chen Q; Ni Y; Li H
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 20512485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.
    Ludwin-Peery E; Bramley NR; Davis E; Gureckis TM
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 33137265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?
    Fisk JE
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):431-49. PubMed ID: 12519527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of instance retrieval in understanding complex concepts.
    Gray KC; Smith EE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):665-74. PubMed ID: 8538440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal conjunction fallacies: the roles of causal strength and mental resources.
    Crisp AK; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2320-37. PubMed ID: 19391046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.
    Lewinski P
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1832. PubMed ID: 26635712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary on Wolford, Taylor, and Beck: The conjunction fallacy?
    Bar-Hillel M
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):412-4; discussion 415-7. PubMed ID: 1895951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability and category redefinition in the fault tree paradigm.
    Hirt ER; Castellan NJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Feb; 14(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 2964501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.