545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23558547)
1. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual search for color and shape: when is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values?
Becker SI; Harris AM; Venini D; Retell JD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):264-91. PubMed ID: 23875572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
Liao HI; Yeh SL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
Du F; Jiao J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
Burnham BR; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Schönhammer JG; Grubert A; Kerzel D; Becker SI
Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1074-83. PubMed ID: 26990008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
Carmel T; Lamy D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
Lamy D; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
Ito M; Kawahara JI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Becker SI; Harris AM; York A; Choi J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1828-1842. PubMed ID: 28967786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]