These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance. van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Serences JT; Shomstein S; Leber AB; Golay X; Egeth HE; Yantis S Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 15686577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues. Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simply shapely: relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search. Becker SI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):845-61. PubMed ID: 23653409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Becker SI Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2116-26. PubMed ID: 20691720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. Theeuwes J; Burger R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The time course of the contingent spatial blink. Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Eimer M; Kiss M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture. Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons. Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age. Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]