These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The persistence of the attentional bias to regularities in a changing environment. Yu RQ; Zhao J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2217-28. PubMed ID: 26037211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations. Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities. Damsma A; Taatgen N; de Jong R; van Rijn H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1136-1149. PubMed ID: 31485992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Eimer M; Kiss M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preserved capacity for learning statistical regularities and directing selective attention after hippocampal lesions. Rungratsameetaweemana N; Squire LR; Serences JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Sep; 116(39):19705-19710. PubMed ID: 31492814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation. Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex related biases for attending to object color versus object position are reflected in reaction time and accuracy. McGivern RF; Mosso M; Freudenberg A; Handa RJ PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210272. PubMed ID: 30625223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information. van Moorselaar D; Lampers E; Cordesius E; Slagter HA Elife; 2020 Dec; 9():. PubMed ID: 33320084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination. Fujisaki W; Nishida S Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape. Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond time and space: The effect of a lateralized sustained attention task and brain stimulation on spatial and selective attention. Shalev N; De Wandel L; Dockree P; Demeyere N; Chechlacz M Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():131-147. PubMed ID: 29061290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]