322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23559019)
1. The future of biomedical research.
Emanuel EJ
JAMA; 2013 Apr; 309(15):1589-90. PubMed ID: 23559019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Collins sets out his vision for the NIH.
Dolgin E
Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7258):939. PubMed ID: 19693051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sustaining the engine of U.S. biomedical discovery.
Heinig SJ; Krakower JY; Dickler HB; Korn D
N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep; 357(10):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17804852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The NIH stimulus--the recovery act and biomedical research.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1479-81. PubMed ID: 19357402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Disappointment in slow-down for biomedical funding.
Wadman M
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559. PubMed ID: 15729751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of research funding in academic medicine.
Campbell EG
N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1482-3. PubMed ID: 19357403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical research: facing the opposition.
Check E
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):17-9. PubMed ID: 16672943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
Garrison HH; McGuire KI; Palazzo RE
Physiologist; 2007 Aug; 50(4):129, 131-3. PubMed ID: 17883021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Good news and bad news.
Garrison H; Bartholme N
Physiologist; 2006 Aug; 49(4):201, 203-5. PubMed ID: 16915995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Why the U.S. budget sequester is a disaster for the future of biomedical science.
Gore AC
Endocrinology; 2013 Sep; 154(9):2987-8. PubMed ID: 23873155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Budget woes, sequester place researchers in a bind: young researchers hard hit.
Kuehn BM
JAMA; 2014 Jan; 311(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 24381954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
Loscalzo J
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1665-7. PubMed ID: 16625006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science and the war on drugs: a hard habit to break.
Pearson H
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6998):394-5. PubMed ID: 15269737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomedical funding remains flat.
Check E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):644. PubMed ID: 16496450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Science and government. Review for NCCAM is overdue.
Marcus DM; Grollman AP
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5785):301-2. PubMed ID: 16857923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 2008 U.S. budget. Research rises--and falls--in the president's spending plan.
Mervis J
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5813):750-3. PubMed ID: 17289949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomedical research in the USA: at the dawn of a golden age?
Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10013):1. PubMed ID: 26766330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Obama's science legacy: betting big on biomedical science.
Ledford H
Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7617):385-6. PubMed ID: 27558044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
