89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23559190)
1. Native acetabular version: 3D CT analysis
of the psoas valley.
Osmani HT; Henckel J; Cobb J; Hart AJ
Hip Int; 2013; 23(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 23559190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.
Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.
Thelen T; Thelen P; Demezon H; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 28025151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction.
Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Musielak B; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():42. PubMed ID: 25887277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical variation of the Psoas Valley: a scoping review.
Kuroda Y; Rai A; Saito M; Khanduja V
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):219. PubMed ID: 32276620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved accuracy of CT based measurements for anterior prominence of acetabular prosthesis using a novel protocol based on anatomical landmarks.
Brownlie CA; Evans R; Morrison D; Hayes A; Song S; Kuster MS
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 May; 106(3):563-568. PubMed ID: 31959362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Buller LT; Rosneck J; Monaco FM; Butler R; Smith T; Barsoum WK
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22031856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is MRI an adequate replacement for CT scans in the three-dimensional assessment of acetabular morphology?
Goronzy J; Blum S; Hartmann A; Plodeck V; Franken L; Günther KP; Thielemann F
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):726-734. PubMed ID: 30149750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large ball metal on metal hips obscure cup angle measurement on plain radiographs.
Hart AJ; Dandachli W; Schlueter-Brust K; Henckel J; Cobb J
Hip Int; 2009; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 20041378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.
Dandachli W; Ul Islam S; Tippett R; Hall-Craggs MA; Witt JD
Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Jul; 40(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 21181403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Definition of a quantitative measurement method for acetabular version in a plain radiograph in the healthy adult hip.
Özçelik A; Akalın Y; Çalışır C; İnan U; Ömeroğlu H
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2015; 26(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 25741912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vivo comparison of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and the acetabulum.
Griffin AR; Perriman DM; Bolton CJ; Smith PN
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 24051239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images.
Chong le R; Too CW
Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24337490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is transverse acetabular ligament a reliable guide for aligning cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty?: A measurement by CT arthrography in 90 hips.
Yoon BH; Ha YC; Lee YK; Jo WL; Lee KM; Koo KH
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 26714668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.
Kalteis T; Handel M; Herold T; Perlick L; Paetzel C; Grifka J
Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 16289687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.
Fritz B; Agten CA; Boldt FK; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5691-5699. PubMed ID: 30903332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum.
Nagao Y; Aoki H; Ishii SJ; Masuda T; Beppu M
J Orthop Sci; 2008 Jan; 13(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 18274858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The asymmetric profile of the acetabulum.
Vandenbussche E; Saffarini M; Taillieu F; Mutschler C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Feb; 466(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 18196426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
