These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23559698)

  • 1. Equipment errors: a prevalent cause for fallacy in blood pressure recording - a point prevalence estimate from an Indian health university.
    Mishra B; Sinha ND; Gidwani H; Shukla SK; Kawatra A; Mehta S
    Indian J Community Med; 2013 Jan; 38(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 23559698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate blood pressure recording: is it difficult?
    Bhalla A; Singh R; D'cruz S; Lehl SS; Sachdev A
    Indian J Med Sci; 2005 Nov; 59(11):480-7. PubMed ID: 16340147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.
    Clark JA; Lieh-Lai MW; Sarnaik A; Mattoo TK
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):920-3. PubMed ID: 12415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Aktiia blood pressure cuff for clinical use according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol.
    Alexandre J; Tan K; Almeida TP; Sola J; Alpert BS; Shah J
    Blood Press Monit; 2023 Apr; 28(2):109-112. PubMed ID: 36795403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal size of cuff bladder for indirect measurement of arterial pressure in adults.
    Russell AE; Wing LM; Smith SA; Aylward PE; McRitchie RJ; Hassam RM; West MJ; Chalmers JP
    J Hypertens; 1989 Aug; 7(8):607-13. PubMed ID: 2681407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How accurate are sphygmomanometers?
    Mion D; Pierin AM
    J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Apr; 12(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 9607693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
    Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
    Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A design and study of a novel electronic device for cuff-pressure monitoring].
    Wang S; Li W; Li W; Song D; Chen D; Duan J; Li C; Li G
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2017 Jun; 29(6):551-555. PubMed ID: 28625247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing cuff width for noninvasive measurement of blood pressure.
    Marks LA; Groch A
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Jun; 5(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 10915227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditing the technology used to measure blood pressure.
    Amoore JN; Guehenec M; Scordecchia R; Scott DH
    J Med Eng Technol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 20121458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparently less value of blood pressure among healthy people: is the cuff width responsible?
    Pramanik T; Shrestha S; Ghosh A
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Sep; 48(3):83-4. PubMed ID: 18274343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of arm position and pulse pressure on the validation of a wrist-cuff blood pressure measurement device in a high risk population.
    Khoshdel AR; Carney S; Gillies A
    Int J Gen Med; 2010 Apr; 3():119-25. PubMed ID: 20463830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Level of Mercury Manometer With Respect to Heart: Does it Affect Blood Pressure Measurement?
    Kapoor R; Roy VK; Manna S; Bhattacharjee M
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 26685514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
    Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Cuff Width, Sex, and Race on Arterial Occlusion: Implications for Blood Flow Restriction Research.
    Jessee MB; Buckner SL; Dankel SJ; Counts BR; Abe T; Loenneke JP
    Sports Med; 2016 Jun; 46(6):913-21. PubMed ID: 26820301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.