These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23561716)

  • 1. [Cost analysis comparing single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and conventional reusable fiberoptic flexible scopes for difficult tracheal intubation].
    Aïssou M; Coroir M; Debes C; Camus T; Hadri N; Gutton C; Beaussier M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 23561716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A comparative cost analysis of single-use versus reusable fiberoptic bronchoscopes: Is single-use fiberscope worth it?].
    Videau M; Rghioui K; Mottet B; Sainfort A; Lefort I
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2017 Nov; 75(6):473-479. PubMed ID: 28818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
    Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible optical scopes for tracheal intubation: a descriptive comparative study of reusable and single-use scopes.
    Gupta D; Wang H
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Dec; 23(8):632-5. PubMed ID: 22137515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the Ambu(®) aScope™ in 10 patients with predicted difficult intubation.
    Pujol E; López AM; Valero R
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Oct; 65(10):1037-40. PubMed ID: 20707786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost comparison of re-usable and single-use fibrescopes in a large English teaching hospital.
    McCahon RA; Whynes DK
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Jun; 70(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 25644476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu
    Perbet S; Blanquet M; Mourgues C; Delmas J; Bertran S; Longère B; Boïko-Alaux V; Chennell P; Bazin JE; Constantin JM
    Ann Intensive Care; 2017 Dec; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 28050896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the single-use Ambu(®) aScope™ 2 vs the conventional fibrescope for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation by a semirigid collar*.
    Krugel V; Bathory I; Frascarolo P; Schoettker P
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Jan; 68(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23088837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation -- a randomised study.
    Kristensen MS; Fredensborg BB
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Aug; 57(7):888-95. PubMed ID: 23495767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the Ambu aScope 3 Slim single-use fiberscope equally efficient compared with a conventional bronchoscope for management of the difficult airway?
    Fukada T; Tsuchiya Y; Iwakiri H; Ozaki M
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 May; 30():68-73. PubMed ID: 27041269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-use flexible bronchoscopes compared with reusable bronchoscopes: Positive organizational impact but a costly solution.
    Châteauvieux C; Farah L; Guérot E; Wermert D; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I; Martelli N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):528-535. PubMed ID: 29573067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Costs of reusable and disposable aprons in a public teaching hospital].
    Pissinati Pde S; Haddad Mdo C; Rossaneis MÂ; Gil RB; Belei RA
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2014 Oct; 48(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 25493497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomised controlled trial comparing the Ambu® aScope™2 with a conventional fibreoptic bronchoscope in orotracheal intubation of anaesthetised adult patients.
    Chan JK; Ng I; Ang JP; Koh SM; Lee K; Mezzavia P; Morris J; Loh F; Segal R
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2015 Jul; 43(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 26099760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a single-use intubating videoscope (Ambu aScope ™) in three airway training manikins for oral intubation, nasal intubation and intubation via three supraglottic airway devices.
    Scutt S; Clark N; Cook TM; Smith C; Christmas T; Coppel L; Crewdson K
    Anaesthesia; 2011 Apr; 66(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 21401543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.