These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23561824)

  • 61. Hybrid Predictive Model for Lifting by Integrating Skeletal Motion Prediction With an OpenSim Musculoskeletal Model.
    Zaman R; Xiang Y; Rakshit R; Yang J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Mar; 69(3):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 34550877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Muscle discretization affects the loading transferred to bones in lower-limb musculoskeletal models.
    Valente G; Martelli S; Taddei F; Farinella G; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22468467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Biotensegrity and myofascial chains: A global approach to an integrated kinetic chain.
    Dischiavi SL; Wright AA; Hegedus EJ; Bleakley CM
    Med Hypotheses; 2018 Jan; 110():90-96. PubMed ID: 29317079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models.
    Lund ME; de Zee M; Andersen MS; Rasmussen J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):82-94. PubMed ID: 22468460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Advanced modeling environment for developing and testing FES control systems.
    Davoodi R; Brown IE; Loeb GE
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jan; 25(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12485781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement.
    Delp SL; Anderson FC; Arnold AS; Loan P; Habib A; John CT; Guendelman E; Thelen DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):1940-50. PubMed ID: 18018689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. On the mechanical power of joint extensions as affected by the change in muscle force (or cross-sectional area), ceteris paribus.
    Minetti AE
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Feb; 86(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 11990751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Physiological prediction of muscle forces--I. Theoretical formulation.
    Kaufman KR; An KW; Litchy WJ; Chao EY
    Neuroscience; 1991; 40(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 2062441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Letter to the editor: in response to "Consistency among musculoskeletal models: caveat utilitor".
    Modenese L; Phillips AT; Bull AM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 43(4):1052-4. PubMed ID: 25377765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Theoretical considerations on cocontraction of sets of agonistic and antagonistic muscles.
    Ait-Haddou R; Binding P; Herzog W
    J Biomech; 2000 Sep; 33(9):1105-11. PubMed ID: 10854883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Direct Methods for Predicting Movement Biomechanics Based Upon Optimal Control Theory with Implementation in OpenSim.
    Porsa S; Lin YC; Pandy MG
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 44(8):2542-2557. PubMed ID: 26715209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The development of lower limb musculoskeletal models with clinical relevance is dependent upon the fidelity of the mathematical description of the lower limb. Part 2: Patient-specific geometry.
    Cleather DJ; Bull AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 22468465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Multisegmental foot modeling: a review.
    Rankine L; Long J; Canseco K; Harris GF
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2008; 36(2-3):127-81. PubMed ID: 19740070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Optimization solutions depend on the choice of coordinate system.
    Czaplicki A
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2008; 10(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 19032002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Reply to "Letter to the editor: Consistency among musculoskeletal models: caveat utilitor".
    Wagner DW; Stepanyan V; Shippen JM; DeMers MS; Gibbons RS; Andrews BJ; Creasey GH; Beaupre GS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 43(4):1055-6. PubMed ID: 25366902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. In response to "Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analysis" by R.T. Raikova and B.I. Prilutsky and "A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion" by R.D. Crowninsheild and R.A. Brand.
    Ait-Haddou R; Jinha A; Herzog W
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1433-5; author reply 1437-8. PubMed ID: 12231290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mechanobiological simulations of prenatal joint morphogenesis.
    Giorgi M; Carriero A; Shefelbine SJ; Nowlan NC
    J Biomech; 2014 Mar; 47(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 24529755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. OpenSim Moco: Musculoskeletal optimal control.
    Dembia CL; Bianco NA; Falisse A; Hicks JL; Delp SL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008493. PubMed ID: 33370252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Optimal control of non-ballistic muscular movements: a constraint-based performance criterion for rising from a chair.
    Pandy MG; Garner BA; Anderson FC
    J Biomech Eng; 1995 Feb; 117(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7609479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A control theoretic model of the forearm.
    Rehbinder H; Martin C
    J Biomech; 2001 Jun; 34(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 11470111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.