These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23562485)
1. Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients? Mioton LM; Smetona JT; Hanwright PJ; Seth AK; Wang E; Bilimoria KY; Gaido J; Fine NA; Kim JY J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jul; 66(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 23562485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications. Davila AA; Mioton LM; Chow G; Wang E; Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; Fine N; Kim JY J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Oct; 47(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 23547540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Hanwright PJ; Davila AA; Hirsch EM; Khan SA; Fine NA; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):938-45. PubMed ID: 23769660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perforator flap breast reconstruction after unsatisfactory implant reconstruction. Levine SM; Lester ME; Fontenot B; Allen RJ Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 21301299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Gart MS; Smetona JT; Hanwright PJ; Fine NA; Bethke KP; Khan SA; Wang E; Kim JY J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Feb; 216(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 23211118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term reconstructive outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction with serious infectious or wound-healing complications. Peled AW; Stover AC; Foster RD; McGrath MH; Hwang ES Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22421481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients. Mlodinow AS; Ver Halen JP; Lim S; Nguyen KT; Gaido JA; Kim JY Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 24025652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flap Failure and Wound Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Perspective. Massenburg BB; Sanati-Mehrizy P; Ingargiola MJ; Rosa JH; Taub PJ Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 26487657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of the risks and benefits of immediate autologous breast reconstruction in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation therapy. Mirzabeigi MN; Smartt JM; Nelson JA; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Wu LC Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23542828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ischaemic time and fat necrosis in breast reconstruction with a free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Lee KT; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Mun GH J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Feb; 66(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 23102871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous lumpectomy and radiation therapy: analysis of complications and satisfaction. Khansa I; Colakoglu S; Curtis MS; Yueh JH; Ogunleye A; Tobias AM; Lee BT Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):444-51. PubMed ID: 21451371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Atisha D; Alderman AK; Janiga T; Singal B; Wilkins EG Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19770703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ramifications of immediate reconstruction in the management of breast cancer. Holley DT; Toursarkissian B; Vásconez HC; Wells MD; Kenady DE; Sloan DA; McGrath PC Am Surg; 1995 Jan; 61(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 7832384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Schaverien MV; Perks AG; McCulley SJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 17720644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increments in ischaemia time induces microvascular complications in the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Marre D; Hontanilla B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jan; 66(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 22981497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A predictive model of risk and outcomes in tissue expander reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 9786 patients. Hanwright PJ; Davila AA; Mioton LM; Fine NA; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Dec; 47(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 23627559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the reconstruction method influence development of mastectomy flap complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Lee KT; Pyon JK; Bang SI; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Mun GH J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1543-50. PubMed ID: 23834909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]