BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23562954)

  • 1. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation.
    Cil AP; Seli E
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 25(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 23562954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective oocyte freezing for nonmedical reasons: a 6-year report on utilization and in vitro fertilization results from a Swedish center.
    Wennberg AL; Schildauer K; Brännström M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1429-1434. PubMed ID: 31173348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cryopreserved oocytes: update on clinical applications and success rates.
    Paramanantham J; Talmor AJ; Osianlis T; Weston GC
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Feb; 70(2):97-114. PubMed ID: 25671372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Cobo A; Diaz C
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 21718983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification.
    Levi-Setti PE; Patrizio P; Scaravelli G
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2016 Dec; 23(6):445-450. PubMed ID: 27653002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New national outcome data on fresh versus cryopreserved donor oocytes.
    Kushnir VA; Darmon SK; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Jan; 11(1):2. PubMed ID: 29304839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future.
    Gunnala V; Schattman G
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 29(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 27922944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
    Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of cytoplasmic granulation patterns during in vitro fertilization in metaphase II oocytes: part II, donor oocyte cycles.
    Hu J; Molinari E; Darmon SK; Zhang L; Patrizio P; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Nov; 116(5):1330-1340. PubMed ID: 34294452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
    Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles.
    Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now?
    Argyle CE; Harper JC; Davies MC
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):440-9. PubMed ID: 27006004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Vitrification of oocytes for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer].
    Teng XM; Li KM; Wang Y; Pan JP; Yin P; Liang SS; Ruan JL; Chen ZQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2012 Jun; 18(6):531-3. PubMed ID: 22774609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of 7515 same donor oocyte cycle fresh and cryopreserved-thawed oocytes in 609 donor oocyte recipient cycles: A single institution analysis.
    Gursu T; Goksever Celik H; Eraslan A; Angun B; Ozaltin S; Yeh J; Bastu E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Oct; 277():110-115. PubMed ID: 36067608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.
    Cobo A; García-Velasco J; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 30383235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oocyte vitrification for oncological and social reasons.
    Köroğlu N; Aydın T
    Turk J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 20(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 36908095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.