297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564036)
21. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of PET reconstruction technique and matrix size on qualitative and quantitative assessment of lung lesions on [18F]-FDG-PET: A prospective study in 37 cancer patients.
Riegler G; Karanikas G; Rausch I; Hirtl A; El-Rabadi K; Marik W; Pivec C; Weber M; Prosch H; Mayerhoefer M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():20-26. PubMed ID: 28583635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment response assessment in [
Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis.
Kuhnert G; Boellaard R; Sterzer S; Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Wolf J; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; Kobe C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):249-258. PubMed ID: 26280981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does PET Reconstruction Method Affect Deauville Score in Lymphoma Patients?
Enilorac B; Lasnon C; Nganoa C; Fruchart C; Gac AC; Damaj G; Aide N
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1049-1055. PubMed ID: 29242403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization and simulation of noise in PET images reconstructed with OSEM: Development of a method for the generation of synthetic images.
Castro P; Huerga C; Chamorro P; Garayoa J; Roch M; Pérez L
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(4):229-236. PubMed ID: 29678630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel partial volume effects correction technique integrating deconvolution associated with denoising within an iterative PET image reconstruction.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):804-19. PubMed ID: 25652494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs).
Lasnon C; Enilorac B; Popotte H; Aide N
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):30. PubMed ID: 28361349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of the physiological background correction method for the suppression of the spill-in effect near highly radioactive regions in positron emission tomography.
Akerele MI; Wadhwa P; Silva-Rodriguez J; Hallett W; Tsoumpas C
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Dec; 5(1):34. PubMed ID: 30519974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Verification of the tumor volume delineation method using a fixed threshold of peak standardized uptake value.
Koyama K; Mitsumoto T; Shiraishi T; Tsuda K; Nishiyama A; Inoue K; Yoshikawa K; Hatano K; Kubota K; Fukushi M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):311-320. PubMed ID: 28676945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variability and Repeatability of Quantitative Uptake Metrics in
Zhuang M; García DV; Kramer GM; Frings V; Smit EF; Dierckx R; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):600-607. PubMed ID: 30389824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
