297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564036)
41. Tumor volume-adapted SUV
Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Nasiri-Feshani Z; Ghafarian P; Alavi M; Haddadi G; Ketabi A
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):811-823. PubMed ID: 33880686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Point Spread Function Reconstruction for Integrated 18F-FET PET/MRI in Patients With Glioma: Does It Affect SUVs and Respective Tumor-to-Background Ratios?
Rogasch JMM; Albers J; Steinkrüger FL; Lukas M; Wedel F; Amthauer H; Furth C
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 44(4):e280-e285. PubMed ID: 30562198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM.
Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function in SUV quantification for oncological PET.
Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Peñuelas I; Richter JÁ; Martí-Climent JM
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 28660224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear without PSF correction in amyloid PET images.
Wagatsuma K; Sakata M; Miwa K; Hamano Y; Kawakami H; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Miyaji N; Ishibashi K; Tago T; Toyohara J; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Apr; 11(1):37. PubMed ID: 38647924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of point spread function modelling and time of flight on FDG uptake measurements in lung lesions using alternative filtering strategies.
Armstrong IS; Kelly MD; Williams HA; Matthews JC
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):99. PubMed ID: 26501457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of point spread function-based image reconstruction on neuroreceptor binding in positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]FLB 457.
Thongpraparn T; Ikoma Y; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Ito H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 26676853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.
Tong S; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1453-73. PubMed ID: 20150683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images.
Itagaki K; Mitsumoto K; Kajisako M; Shioji M; Kawase S
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2023; 11(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 36619185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Influence of Minimal Misalignment on the Repeatability of PET Images Examined by the Repositioning of Point Sources.
Maebatake A; Morita K; Akamatsu G; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 30413592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Positron range in combination with point-spread-function correction: an evaluation of different implementations for [124I]-PET imaging.
Kertész H; Conti M; Panin V; Cabello J; Bharkhada D; Beyer T; Papp L; Jentzen W; Cal-Gonzalez J; Herraiz JL; López-Montes A; Rausch I
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Aug; 9(1):56. PubMed ID: 35984531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical Application of a High Sensitivity BGO PET/CT Scanner: Effects of Acquisition Protocols and Reconstruction Parameters on Lesions Quantification.
De Ponti E; Crivellaro C; Morzenti S; Monaco L; Todde S; Landoni C; Elisei F; Musarra M; Guerra L
Curr Radiopharm; 2022; 15(3):218-227. PubMed ID: 34994322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation.
van Velden FH; Kramer GM; Frings V; Nissen IA; Mulder ER; de Langen AJ; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; Boellaard R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Oct; 18(5):788-95. PubMed ID: 26920355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial].
Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
