331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564608)
1. Highly time-variable exposure to chemicals--toward an assessment strategy.
Ashauer R; Brown CD
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e27-33. PubMed ID: 23564608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling as an acute risk assessment refinement approach in vertebrate ecological risk assessment.
Ducrot V; Ashauer R; Bednarska AJ; Hinarejos S; Thorbek P; Weyman G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 25833822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment.
Ashauer R; Escher BI
J Environ Monit; 2010 Nov; 12(11):2056-61. PubMed ID: 20862435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crucial role of mechanisms and modes of toxic action for understanding tissue residue toxicity and internal effect concentrations of organic chemicals.
Escher BI; Ashauer R; Dyer S; Hermens JL; Lee JH; Leslie HA; Mayer P; Meador JP; Warne MS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jan; 7(1):28-49. PubMed ID: 21184568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges for exposure prediction in ecological risk assessment.
Di Guardo A; Hermens JL
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e4-14. PubMed ID: 23610044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Modeling of the Effects of Pesticides on Growth of
Martin T; Thompson H; Thorbek P; Ashauer R
Chem Res Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 32(11):2281-2294. PubMed ID: 31674768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to use mechanistic effect models in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Case studies and recommendations from the SETAC workshop MODELINK.
Hommen U; Forbes V; Grimm V; Preuss TG; Thorbek P; Ducrot V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26437629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How TK-TD and population models for aquatic macrophytes could support the risk assessment for plant protection products.
Hommen U; Schmitt W; Heine S; Brock TC; Duquesne S; Manson P; Meregalli G; Ochoa-Acuña H; van Vliet P; Arts G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 26420056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population-level effects and recovery of aquatic invertebrates after multiple applications of an insecticide.
Dohmen GP; Preuss TG; Hamer M; Galic N; Strauss T; van den Brink PJ; De Laender F; Bopp S
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 26119989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of traits-based approaches and eco(toxico)logical models to advance the ecological risk assessment framework for chemicals.
Van den Brink PJ; Baird DJ; Baveco HJ; Focks A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e47-57. PubMed ID: 23625553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.
Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generalized Haber's law for exponential concentration decline, with application to riparian-aquatic pesticide ecotoxicity.
Bogen KT; Reiss R
Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 21838729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human biomonitoring as a pragmatic tool to support health risk management of chemicals--examples under the EU REACH programme.
Boogaard PJ; Hays SM; Aylward LL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 20933039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Draft DG SANCO document: addressing the new challenges for risk assessment--an industry perspective.
Campbell P; Dohmen P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e81-4. PubMed ID: 23564648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biological characteristic extrapolation of compound toxicity for different developmental stage species with toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic model.
Gao Y; Xie Z; Feng M; Feng J; Zhu L
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Oct; 203():111043. PubMed ID: 32888597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the contribution of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic processes to the recovery of Gammarus pulex populations after exposure to pesticides.
Galic N; Ashauer R; Baveco H; Nyman AM; Barsi A; Thorbek P; Bruns E; Van den Brink PJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Jul; 33(7):1476-88. PubMed ID: 24307654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of comparative genomics approaches to characterize interspecies differences in response to environmental chemicals: challenges, opportunities, and research needs.
Burgess-Herbert SL; Euling SY
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 271(3):372-85. PubMed ID: 22142766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanistic effect modeling for ecological risk assessment: where to go from here?
Grimm V; Martin BT
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23564619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic considerations when deriving health-based exposure limits for pharmaceuticals.
Reichard JF; Maier MA; Naumann BD; Pecquet AM; Pfister T; Sandhu R; Sargent EV; Streeter AJ; Weideman PA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79 Suppl 1():S67-78. PubMed ID: 27224509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]