179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564723)
1. Histological and biomechanical analysis of porous additive manufactured implants made by direct metal laser sintering: a pilot study in sheep.
Stübinger S; Mosch I; Robotti P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Oct; 101(7):1154-63. PubMed ID: 23564723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of titanium implants functionalised with phosphoserine-tethered poly(epsilon-lysine) dendrons: a comparative study with traditional surface treatments in sheep.
Stübinger S; Nuss K; Bürki A; Mosch I; le Sidler M; Meikle ST; von Rechenberg B; Santin M
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Feb; 26(2):87. PubMed ID: 25644101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Er:YAG laser, piezoelectric, and drill osteotomy for dental implant site preparation: a biomechanical and histological analysis in sheep.
Stübinger S; Biermeier K; Bächi B; Ferguson SJ; Sader R; von Rechenberg B
Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Sep; 42(7):652-61. PubMed ID: 20806390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of strontium and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite electrochemical coatings on bone ingrowth and osseointegration of selective laser sintered porous metal implants.
Mumith A; Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227232. PubMed ID: 31923253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast plasma sintering delivers functional graded materials components with macroporous structures and osseointegration properties.
Godoy RF; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW; Alves AL; Robotti P; Goodship AE
Eur Cell Mater; 2016 Apr; 31():250-63. PubMed ID: 27071735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laser-Treated Titanium Implants: An In Vivo Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Colagiovanni M; Berardi D; Perfetti G
Implant Dent; 2016 Oct; 25(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 27548108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced bone formation in locally-optimised, low-stiffness additive manufactured titanium implants: An in silico and in vivo tibial advancement study.
Shum JM; Gadomski BC; Tredinnick SJ; Fok W; Fernandez J; Nelson B; Palmer RH; McGilvray KC; Hooper GJ; Puttlitz C; Easley J; Woodfield TBF
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():202-213. PubMed ID: 35413478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Nanostructured Surface on Titanium Implants Increases Osseointegration in a Sheep Model.
Jones CF; Quarrington RD; Tsangari H; Starczak Y; Mulaibrahimovic A; Burzava ALS; Christou C; Barker AJ; Morel J; Bright R; Barker D; Brown T; Vasilev K; Anderson PH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Nov; 480(11):2232-2250. PubMed ID: 36001022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective laser melting of titanium alloy enables osseointegration of porous multi-rooted implants in a rabbit model.
Peng W; Xu L; You J; Fang L; Zhang Q
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jul; 15(1):85. PubMed ID: 27439427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel hydrophilic nanostructured microtexture on direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V surfaces enhances osteoblast response in vitro and osseointegration in a rabbit model.
Hyzy SL; Cheng A; Cohen DJ; Yatzkaier G; Whitehead AJ; Clohessy RM; Gittens RA; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Aug; 104(8):2086-98. PubMed ID: 27086616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different surgical drilling procedures on full laser-etched microgrooves surface-treated implants: an experimental study in sheep.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Yoo DY; Janal MN; Anchieta RB; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1072-7. PubMed ID: 23772753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseointegration of three-dimensional designed titanium implants manufactured by selective laser melting.
Shaoki A; Xu JY; Sun H; Chen XS; Ouyang J; Zhuang XM; Deng FL
Biofabrication; 2016 Oct; 8(4):045014. PubMed ID: 27788123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring the osseointegration process in porous Ti6Al4V implants produced by additive manufacturing: an experimental study in sheep.
Kayacan MC; Baykal YB; Karaaslan T; Özsoy K; Alaca İ; Duman B; Delikanlı YE
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2018 Apr; 16(2):68-75. PubMed ID: 29147992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.
Yuan K; Chan YJ; Kung KC; Lee TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 24451851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of preclinical in vivo testing of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic applications, part I: Animal models and bone ingrowth outcome measures.
Spece H; Basgul C; Andrews CE; MacDonald DW; Taheri ML; Kurtz SM
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2021 Oct; 109(10):1436-1454. PubMed ID: 33484102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-strength, porous additively manufactured implants with optimized mechanical osseointegration.
Kelly CN; Wang T; Crowley J; Wills D; Pelletier MH; Westrick ER; Adams SB; Gall K; Walsh WR
Biomaterials; 2021 Dec; 279():121206. PubMed ID: 34715639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
