These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564750)

  • 1. Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium.
    Fischer C; Kuchenbäcker K; Engel C; Zachariae S; Rhiem K; Meindl A; Rahner N; Dikow N; Plendl H; Debatin I; Grimm T; Gadzicki D; Flöttmann R; Horvath J; Schröck E; Stock F; Schäfer D; Schwaab I; Kartsonaki C; Mavaddat N; Schlegelberger B; Antoniou AC; Schmutzler R;
    J Med Genet; 2013 Jun; 50(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 23564750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BOADICEA and BRCAPRO models and penetrance estimation in high-risk French-Canadian families.
    Antoniou AC; Durocher F; Smith P; Simard J; Easton DF;
    Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(1):R3. PubMed ID: 16417652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of three BRCA1/2 mutation-carrier probability models Myriad, BRCAPRO and BOADICEA in a population-based series of 183 German families.
    Schneegans SM; Rosenberger A; Engel U; Sander M; Emons G; Shoukier M
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Jun; 11(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 22160602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.
    Antoniou AC; Hardy R; Walker L; Evans DG; Shenton A; Eeles R; Shanley S; Pichert G; Izatt L; Rose S; Douglas F; Eccles D; Morrison PJ; Scott J; Zimmern RL; Easton DF; Pharoah PD
    J Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 45(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 18413374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.
    Hung FH; Wang YA; Jian JW; Peng HP; Hsieh LL; Hung CF; Yang MM; Yang AS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10229. PubMed ID: 31308460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients.
    Moghadasi S; Grundeken V; Janssen LAM; Dijkstra NH; Rodríguez-Girondo M; van Zelst-Stams WAG; Oosterwijk JC; Ausems MGEM; Oldenburg RA; Adank MA; Blom EW; Ruijs MWG; van Os TAM; van Deurzen CHM; Martens JWM; Schroder CP; Wijnen JT; Vreeswijk MPG; van Asperen CJ
    Clin Genet; 2018 Jan; 93(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28589637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms.
    Mavaddat N; Rebbeck TR; Lakhani SR; Easton DF; Antoniou AC
    Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(3):R28. PubMed ID: 20482762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families.
    Barcenas CH; Hosain GM; Arun B; Zong J; Zhou X; Chen J; Cortada JM; Mills GB; Tomlinson GE; Miller AR; Strong LC; Amos CI
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jan; 24(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 16421416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.
    Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer and
    Kenan ES; Friger M; Shochat-Bigon D; Schayek H; Bernstein-Molho R; Friedman E
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Aug; 38(8):4557-4563. PubMed ID: 30061222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical problems with clinical guidelines for breast cancer prevention based on remaining lifetime risk.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Hopper JL; Strauch K; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25956172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population frequencies of pathogenic alleles of BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 173 Danish breast cancer pedigrees using the BOADICEA model.
    Terkelsen T; Christensen LL; Fenton DC; Jensen UB; Sunde L; Thomassen M; Skytte AB
    Fam Cancer; 2019 Oct; 18(4):381-388. PubMed ID: 31435815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the added value of breast tumor markers in genetic risk prediction model BRCAPRO.
    Biswas S; Tankhiwale N; Blackford A; Barrera AM; Ready K; Lu K; Amos CI; Parmigiani G; Arun B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 May; 133(1):347-55. PubMed ID: 22270937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic testing in an ethnically diverse cohort of high-risk women: a comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in American families of European and African ancestry.
    Nanda R; Schumm LP; Cummings S; Fackenthal JD; Sveen L; Ademuyiwa F; Cobleigh M; Esserman L; Lindor NM; Neuhausen SL; Olopade OI
    JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(15):1925-33. PubMed ID: 16234499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability estimation models for prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: COS compares favourably with other models.
    Roudgari H; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Haites NE
    Fam Cancer; 2008; 7(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18097771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier prediction models in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent.
    Oros KK; Ghadirian P; Maugard CM; Perret C; Paredes Y; Mes-Masson AM; Foulkes WD; Provencher D; Tonin PN
    Clin Genet; 2006 Oct; 70(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 16965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models for different ethnicities and genders: experience in a southern Chinese cohort.
    Kwong A; Wong CH; Suen DT; Co M; Kurian AW; West DW; Ford JM
    World J Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(4):702-13. PubMed ID: 22290208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between CaGene 5.1 and 6.0 for BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: a retrospective study of 150 BRCA1/2 genetic tests in 517 families with breast/ovarian cancer.
    Antonucci I; Provenzano M; Sorino L; Balsamo M; Aceto GM; Battista P; Euhus D; Cianchetti E; Ballerini P; Natoli C; Palka G; Stuppia L
    J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 62(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 27928164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the BOADICEA risk assessment model in women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Ståhlbom AK; Johansson H; Liljegren A; von Wachenfeldt A; Arver B
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Mar; 11(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22124624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    Berry DA; Iversen ES; Gudbjartsson DF; Hiller EH; Garber JE; Peshkin BN; Lerman C; Watson P; Lynch HT; Hilsenbeck SG; Rubinstein WS; Hughes KS; Parmigiani G
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 20(11):2701-12. PubMed ID: 12039933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.