BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23564750)

  • 1. Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium.
    Fischer C; Kuchenbäcker K; Engel C; Zachariae S; Rhiem K; Meindl A; Rahner N; Dikow N; Plendl H; Debatin I; Grimm T; Gadzicki D; Flöttmann R; Horvath J; Schröck E; Stock F; Schäfer D; Schwaab I; Kartsonaki C; Mavaddat N; Schlegelberger B; Antoniou AC; Schmutzler R;
    J Med Genet; 2013 Jun; 50(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 23564750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BOADICEA and BRCAPRO models and penetrance estimation in high-risk French-Canadian families.
    Antoniou AC; Durocher F; Smith P; Simard J; Easton DF;
    Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(1):R3. PubMed ID: 16417652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of three BRCA1/2 mutation-carrier probability models Myriad, BRCAPRO and BOADICEA in a population-based series of 183 German families.
    Schneegans SM; Rosenberger A; Engel U; Sander M; Emons G; Shoukier M
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Jun; 11(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 22160602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.
    Antoniou AC; Hardy R; Walker L; Evans DG; Shenton A; Eeles R; Shanley S; Pichert G; Izatt L; Rose S; Douglas F; Eccles D; Morrison PJ; Scott J; Zimmern RL; Easton DF; Pharoah PD
    J Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 45(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 18413374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.
    Hung FH; Wang YA; Jian JW; Peng HP; Hsieh LL; Hung CF; Yang MM; Yang AS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10229. PubMed ID: 31308460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients.
    Moghadasi S; Grundeken V; Janssen LAM; Dijkstra NH; Rodríguez-Girondo M; van Zelst-Stams WAG; Oosterwijk JC; Ausems MGEM; Oldenburg RA; Adank MA; Blom EW; Ruijs MWG; van Os TAM; van Deurzen CHM; Martens JWM; Schroder CP; Wijnen JT; Vreeswijk MPG; van Asperen CJ
    Clin Genet; 2018 Jan; 93(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28589637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms.
    Mavaddat N; Rebbeck TR; Lakhani SR; Easton DF; Antoniou AC
    Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(3):R28. PubMed ID: 20482762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families.
    Barcenas CH; Hosain GM; Arun B; Zong J; Zhou X; Chen J; Cortada JM; Mills GB; Tomlinson GE; Miller AR; Strong LC; Amos CI
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jan; 24(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 16421416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.
    Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer and
    Kenan ES; Friger M; Shochat-Bigon D; Schayek H; Bernstein-Molho R; Friedman E
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Aug; 38(8):4557-4563. PubMed ID: 30061222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical problems with clinical guidelines for breast cancer prevention based on remaining lifetime risk.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Hopper JL; Strauch K; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25956172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population frequencies of pathogenic alleles of BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 173 Danish breast cancer pedigrees using the BOADICEA model.
    Terkelsen T; Christensen LL; Fenton DC; Jensen UB; Sunde L; Thomassen M; Skytte AB
    Fam Cancer; 2019 Oct; 18(4):381-388. PubMed ID: 31435815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the added value of breast tumor markers in genetic risk prediction model BRCAPRO.
    Biswas S; Tankhiwale N; Blackford A; Barrera AM; Ready K; Lu K; Amos CI; Parmigiani G; Arun B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 May; 133(1):347-55. PubMed ID: 22270937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic testing in an ethnically diverse cohort of high-risk women: a comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in American families of European and African ancestry.
    Nanda R; Schumm LP; Cummings S; Fackenthal JD; Sveen L; Ademuyiwa F; Cobleigh M; Esserman L; Lindor NM; Neuhausen SL; Olopade OI
    JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(15):1925-33. PubMed ID: 16234499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability estimation models for prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: COS compares favourably with other models.
    Roudgari H; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Haites NE
    Fam Cancer; 2008; 7(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18097771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier prediction models in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent.
    Oros KK; Ghadirian P; Maugard CM; Perret C; Paredes Y; Mes-Masson AM; Foulkes WD; Provencher D; Tonin PN
    Clin Genet; 2006 Oct; 70(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 16965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models for different ethnicities and genders: experience in a southern Chinese cohort.
    Kwong A; Wong CH; Suen DT; Co M; Kurian AW; West DW; Ford JM
    World J Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(4):702-13. PubMed ID: 22290208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between CaGene 5.1 and 6.0 for BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: a retrospective study of 150 BRCA1/2 genetic tests in 517 families with breast/ovarian cancer.
    Antonucci I; Provenzano M; Sorino L; Balsamo M; Aceto GM; Battista P; Euhus D; Cianchetti E; Ballerini P; Natoli C; Palka G; Stuppia L
    J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 62(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 27928164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the BOADICEA risk assessment model in women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Ståhlbom AK; Johansson H; Liljegren A; von Wachenfeldt A; Arver B
    Fam Cancer; 2012 Mar; 11(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22124624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    Berry DA; Iversen ES; Gudbjartsson DF; Hiller EH; Garber JE; Peshkin BN; Lerman C; Watson P; Lynch HT; Hilsenbeck SG; Rubinstein WS; Hughes KS; Parmigiani G
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 20(11):2701-12. PubMed ID: 12039933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.