These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23565333)

  • 1. A review of Bayesian state-space modelling of capture-recapture-recovery data.
    King R
    Interface Focus; 2012 Apr; 2(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 23565333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing complex capture-recapture data in the presence of individual and temporal covariates and model uncertainty.
    King R; Brooks SP; Coulson T
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1187-95. PubMed ID: 18325067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models.
    Royle JA; Karanth KU; Gopalaswamy AM; Kumar NS
    Ecology; 2009 Nov; 90(11):3233-44. PubMed ID: 19967878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models.
    Gimenez O; Choquet R
    Ecology; 2010 Apr; 91(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 20462110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for fitting hidden Markov models to multi-state capture-recapture data of invasive carp in the Illinois River.
    Labuzzetta CJ; Coulter AA; Erickson RA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 38191559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling individual effects in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model: a state-space formulation.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17725811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ecologist's introduction to continuous-time multi-state models for capture-recapture data.
    Rushing CS
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Apr; 92(4):936-944. PubMed ID: 36785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing bias in demographic estimates from joint live and dead encounter models.
    Weegman MD; Wilson S; Alisauskas RT; Kellett DK
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9382. PubMed ID: 32612891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data.
    Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using imputation and mixture model approaches to integrate multi-state capture-recapture models with assignment information.
    Wen Z; Pollock KH; Nichols JD; Waser PM; Cao W
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 24571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian estimation of a cancer population by capture-recapture with individual capture heterogeneity and small sample.
    Bailly L; Daurès JP; Dunais B; Pradier C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A local evaluation of the individual state-space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture-recapture.
    Milleret C; Dupont P; Bonenfant C; Brøseth H; Flagstad Ø; Sutherland C; Bischof R
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):352-363. PubMed ID: 30680119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness of Eco-Epidemiological Capture-Recapture Parameter Estimates to Variation in Infection State Uncertainty.
    Benhaiem S; Marescot L; Hofer H; East ML; Lebreton JD; Kramer-Schadt S; Gimenez O
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():197. PubMed ID: 30211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous-time capture-recapture in closed populations.
    Schofield MR; Barker RJ; Gelling N
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):626-635. PubMed ID: 28901008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
    Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating movement into models of grey seal population dynamics.
    Harrison PJ; Buckland ST; Thomas L; Harris R; Pomeroy PP; Harwood J
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):634-45. PubMed ID: 16689946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Zero-inflated count distributions for capture-mark-reencounter data.
    Riecke TV; Gibson D; Sedinger JS; Schaub M
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e9274. PubMed ID: 36177128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture-recapture data.
    Zhang W; Chipperfield JD; Illian JB; Dupont P; Milleret C; de Valpine P; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2023 Jan; 104(1):e3887. PubMed ID: 36217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the Bayesian estimation of a closed population size in the presence of heterogeneity and model uncertainty.
    King R; Brooks SP
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):816-824. PubMed ID: 18047534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.