These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23565542)

  • 1. To the editor: a systematic review of the effects of physical training on load carriage performance.
    Brown P; McConnell A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Mar; 27(3):E1. PubMed ID: 23565542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of the effects of physical training on load carriage performance.
    Knapik JJ; Harman EA; Steelman RA; Graham BS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Feb; 26(2):585-97. PubMed ID: 22130400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
    Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of training on lumbar spine posture and intervertebral disc degeneration in active-duty Marines.
    Rodriguez-Soto AE; Berry DB; Jaworski R; Jensen A; Chung CB; Niederberger B; Qadir A; Kelly KR; Ward SR
    Ergonomics; 2017 Aug; 60(8):1055-1063. PubMed ID: 27788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply: To PMID 22130400.
    Knapik JJ; Harman EA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Mar; 27(3):E1-2. PubMed ID: 23565543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Injuries in women associated with a periodized strength training and running program.
    Reynolds KL; Harman EA; Worsham RE; Sykes MB; Frykman PN; Backus VL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2001 Feb; 15(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 11708698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
    Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuromuscular and cardiovascular responses of Royal Marine recruits to load carriage in the field.
    Fallowfield JL; Blacker SD; Willems ME; Davey T; Layden J
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 22575491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the relationship between discrete and repetitive lifting performance in military tasks.
    Savage RJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Doyle TL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):767-73. PubMed ID: 23897024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of a 12.8-km military load carriage activity on lower limb gait mechanics and muscle activity.
    Rice H; Fallowfield J; Allsopp A; Dixon S
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):649-656. PubMed ID: 27462759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights.
    Savage RJ; Jaffrey MA; Billing DC; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(5):762-9. PubMed ID: 25420678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Effective Is Initial Military-Specific Training in the Development of Physical Performance of Soldiers?
    Groeller H; Burley S; Orchard P; Sampson JA; Billing DC; Linnane D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S158-62. PubMed ID: 26506181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jerry can carriage is an effective predictor of stretcher carry performance.
    Beck B; Carstairs GL; Caldwell Odgers JN; Doyle TL; Middleton KJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):813-20. PubMed ID: 26526182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships of physical performance tests to military-relevant tasks in women.
    Szivak TK; Kraemer WJ; Nindl BC; Gotshalk LA; Volek JS; Gomez AL; Dunn-Lewis C; Looney DP; Comstock BA; Hooper DR; Flanagan SD; Maresh CM
    US Army Med Dep J; 2014; ():20-6. PubMed ID: 24706238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-intensity tasks with external load in military applications: a review.
    O'Neal EK; Hornsby JH; Kelleran KJ
    Mil Med; 2014 Sep; 179(9):950-4. PubMed ID: 25181710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.
    Nindl BC; Jones BH; Van Arsdale SJ; Kelly K; Kraemer WJ
    Mil Med; 2016 Jan; 181(1 Suppl):50-62. PubMed ID: 26741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of basic training on material handling ability and physical fitness of British Army recruits.
    Williams AG; Rayson MP; Jones DA
    Ergonomics; 1999 Aug; 42(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 10504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standard and alternative methods of stretcher carriage: performance, human factors, and cardiorespiratory responses.
    Knapik JJ; Harper W; Crowell HP; Leiter K; Mull B
    Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):639-52. PubMed ID: 10877481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.