BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23565786)

  • 1. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
    Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.
    Pacheco-Unguetti AP; Parmentier FB
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 24098923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10185. PubMed ID: 31308413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distraction at the cocktail party: Attenuation of the irrelevant speech effect after a training of auditory selective attention.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jan; 46(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31436452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.
    Marois A; Marsh JE; Vachon F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Feb; 141():64-74. PubMed ID: 30633950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of distraction: competition among auditory streams modulates gain and disrupts inter-trial phase coherence in the human electroencephalogram.
    Ponjavic-Conte KD; Hambrook DA; Pavlovic S; Tata MS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53953. PubMed ID: 23326548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.
    Dorsi J; Viswanathan N; Rosenblum LD; Dias JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2152-2161. PubMed ID: 30226434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical tracking of multiple streams outside the focus of attention in naturalistic auditory scenes.
    Hausfeld L; Riecke L; Valente G; Formisano E
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():617-626. PubMed ID: 30048749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():41-58. PubMed ID: 29574236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.
    AuBuchon AM; McGill CI; Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):738-748. PubMed ID: 30499097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
    Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning through clamor: The allocation and perception of study time in noise.
    Hanczakowski M; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):1005-1022. PubMed ID: 29975090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
    Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
    Kattner F; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of background speech on attentive sound processing: A pupil dilation study.
    Ríos-López P; Widmann A; Aurelie-Bidet-Caulet ; Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Apr; 174():47-56. PubMed ID: 35150772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.