These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23565793)

  • 21. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.
    Hu X; Liu Z; Li T; Luo L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 25686085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates.
    Grimaldi PJ; Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):634-42. PubMed ID: 20805585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
    Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults.
    Souchay C; Isingrini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 22342997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval.
    Eakin DK; Hertzog C
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 21915761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Processing fluency mediates the influence of perceptual information on monitoring learning of educationally relevant materials.
    Ball BH; Klein KN; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Dec; 20(4):336-48. PubMed ID: 25347408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medial prefrontal cortex plays a critical and selective role in 'feeling of knowing' meta-memory judgments.
    Modirrousta M; Fellows LK
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2958-65. PubMed ID: 18606176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won't: distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments.
    Halamish V; Nussinson R; Ben-Ari L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1621-7. PubMed ID: 23586805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.