These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23565966)

  • 1. Ability of matrix models to explain the past and predict the future of plant populations.
    Crone EE; Ellis MM; Morris WF; Stanley A; Bell T; Bierzychudek P; Ehrlén J; Kaye TN; Knight TM; Lesica P; Oostermeijer G; Quintana-Ascencio PF; Ticktin T; Valverde T; Williams JL; Doak DF; Ganesan R; McEachern K; Thorpe AS; Menges ES
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):968-78. PubMed ID: 23565966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
    Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal analysis of genetic structure to assess population dynamics of reintroduced swift foxes.
    Cullingham CI; Moehrenschlager A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1389-98. PubMed ID: 24033503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do plant ecologists use matrix population models?
    Crone EE; Menges ES; Ellis MM; Bell T; Bierzychudek P; Ehrlén J; Kaye TN; Knight TM; Lesica P; Morris WF; Oostermeijer G; Quintana-Ascencio PF; Stanley A; Ticktin T; Valverde T; Williams JL
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Jan; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21070554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of targets and aggregation on the propagation of error in mortality forecasts.
    Alho JM; Spencer BD
    Math Popul Stud; 1990; 2(3):209-27. PubMed ID: 12283028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landscape heterogeneity is key to forecasting outcomes of plant reintroduction.
    Caughlin TT; Damschen EI; Haddad NM; Levey DJ; Warneke C; Brudvig LA
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Mar; 29(2):e01850. PubMed ID: 30821885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population forecasts and confidence intervals for Sweden: a comparison of model-based and empirical approaches.
    Cohen JE
    Demography; 1986 Feb; 23(1):105-26. PubMed ID: 3484356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of different population model structures for management of threatened plants.
    Regan HM; Bohórquez CI; Keith DA; Regan TJ; Anderson KE
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 27596063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An economic-demographic model of the United States labor market.
    Anderson JM
    Res Popul Econ; 1982; 4():117-53. PubMed ID: 12264899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty variants of population forecasts.
    De Beer J
    Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur; 1992; 9(3):233-53. PubMed ID: 12286778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of short-term demographic data in projecting long-term fate of populations.
    Jäkäläniemi A; Postila H; Tuomi J
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):552-9. PubMed ID: 23458476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of an invasive plant on population dynamics in toads.
    Greenberg DA; Green DM
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 23692126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Persistence of structured populations in random environments.
    Benaïm M; Schreiber SJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Aug; 76(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 19358861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frog population viability under present and future climate conditions: a Bayesian state-space approach.
    McCaffery R; Solonen A; Crone E
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):978-85. PubMed ID: 22574643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Density-structured models for plant population dynamics.
    Freckleton RP; Sutherland WJ; Watkinson AR; Queenborough SA
    Am Nat; 2011 Jan; 177(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21126176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using modeling to improve monitoring of structured populations: are we collecting the right data?
    Katzner T; Milner-Gulland EJ; Bragin E
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):241-52. PubMed ID: 17298530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of Dutch population forecasts].
    De Jong AH
    Maandstat Bevolking; 1995 Nov; 43(11):6-9. PubMed ID: 12347141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation site networks under climate change: accounting for uncertainty.
    Bagchi R; Crosby M; Huntley B; Hole DG; Butchart SH; Collingham Y; Kalra M; Rajkumar J; Rahmani A; Pandey M; Gurung H; Trai le T; Van Quang N; Willis SG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Apr; 19(4):1236-48. PubMed ID: 23504899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting fluctuations of reintroduced ibex populations: the importance of density dependence, environmental stochasticity and uncertain population estimates.
    Saether BE; Lillegård M; Grøtan V; Filli F; Engen S
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):326-36. PubMed ID: 17302840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Population and household forecasts 1995].
    De Beer J
    Maandstat Bevolking; 1996 Jan; 44(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 12291253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.