These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23566199)

  • 1. Clinical recommendations of Cochrane reviews in three different fields of pediatrics (neonatology, neuropediatrics, and complementary and alternative medicine): a systematic analysis.
    Meyer S; Schroeder N; Willhelm C; Gortner L; Girisch W
    Pediatr Int; 2013 Jun; 55(3):396-8. PubMed ID: 23566199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of developing countries in generating Cochrane meta-analyses in the field of pediatrics (neonatology and neuropediatrics): a systematic analysis.
    Meyer S; Willhelm C; Girisch W; Gottschling S; Gräber S; Gortner L
    World Health Popul; 2013; 14(2):24-32. PubMed ID: 23713209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role and limitations of Cochrane reviews at the bedside: a systematic synopsis of five pediatric subspecialties.
    Meyer S; Poryo M; Khosrawikatoli S; Goda Y; Zemlin M
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2017 Sep; 167(11-12):276-281. PubMed ID: 28255743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Cochrane reviews in neonatology: a critical appraisal.
    Willhelm C; Girisch W; Gottschling S; Gräber S; Wahl H; Meyer S
    Pediatr Neonatol; 2013 Aug; 54(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 23602385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Usefulness of Cochrane Collaboration for pediatric cardiology].
    González-de Dios J; Balaguer-Santamaría A; Ochoa-Sangrador C
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):1093-106. PubMed ID: 16185620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration].
    González de Dios J
    Rev Neurol; 2005 Apr 16-30; 40(8):453-9. PubMed ID: 15861325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. n-of-1 randomized controlled trials: an opportunity for complementary and alternative medicine evaluation.
    Johnston BC; Mills E
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Dec; 10(6):979-84. PubMed ID: 15673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
    Punt CJ
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical principles: myths or facts?
    Sylvester R
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based therapy in neonatology: distilling the evidence and applying it in practice.
    Sinclair JC
    Acta Paediatr; 2004 Sep; 93(9):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15384873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The principles and practice of evidence-based neonatology.
    Soll RF; Andruscavage L
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):215-24. PubMed ID: 9917465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and classification of an operational definition of complementary and alternative medicine for the Cochrane collaboration.
    Wieland LS; Manheimer E; Berman BM
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2011; 17(2):50-9. PubMed ID: 21717826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in neonatology and pediatrics publications over the past 12 years.
    Tov AB; Lubetzky R; Mimouni FB; Alper A; Mandel D
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Jul; 96(7):1080-2. PubMed ID: 17524021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Increased use of complementary and alternative therapies within pediatrics. Has medicine failed?].
    Lindgren C
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(40):3957-8. PubMed ID: 12422753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
    Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine.
    Moher D; Soeken K; Sampson M; Ben-Porat L; Berman B
    BMC Pediatr; 2002; 2():3. PubMed ID: 11914146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in neonatal neurology.
    Ballabh P; Back SA
    Clin Perinatol; 2014 Mar; 41(1):xvii-xix. PubMed ID: 24524461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.