125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23566374)
1. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events.
Lin IF; Chang WP; Liao YN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 23566374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information criteria for Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach in Cox regression models.
Nagashima K; Sato Y
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3422-3436. PubMed ID: 28608396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure.
Courvoisier DS; Combescure C; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 21411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Solutions to problems of nonexistence of parameter estimates and sparse data bias in Poisson regression.
Joshi A; Geroldinger A; Jiricka L; Senchaudhuri P; Corcoran C; Heinze G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):253-266. PubMed ID: 34931909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
Heinze G; Dunkler D
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable.
Ogundimu EO; Altman DG; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():175-82. PubMed ID: 26964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist meta-analytical approaches for analyzing time to event data.
Bennett MM; Crowe BJ; Price KL; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):129-45. PubMed ID: 23331227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Cox survival analysis with a neural-Bayesian approach.
Bakker B; Heskes T; Neijt J; Kappen B
Stat Med; 2004 Oct; 23(19):2989-3012. PubMed ID: 15351957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis.
Concato J; Feinstein AR
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 9291696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. PubMed ID: 18227100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applications of Bayesian shrinkage prior models in clinical research with categorical responses.
Bhattacharyya A; Pal S; Mitra R; Rai S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35484507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.
Austin PC; Allignol A; Fine JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():75-84. PubMed ID: 28088594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hierarchical Bayesian formulations for selecting variables in regression models.
Rockova V; Lesaffre E; Luime J; Löwenberg B
Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1221-37. PubMed ID: 22275239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals.
Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22499708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications.
Friston KJ; Glaser DE; Henson RN; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Ashburner J
Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):484-512. PubMed ID: 12030833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis.
Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 17329317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
