126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23566374)
21. Bias in Odds Ratios From Logistic Regression Methods With Sparse Data Sets.
Gosho M; Ohigashi T; Nagashima K; Ito Y; Maruo K
J Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):265-275. PubMed ID: 34565762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Feinstein AR; Holford TR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 48(12):1503-10. PubMed ID: 8543964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
Heinze G; Puhr R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale.
Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT
J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bayesian analysis of RNA sequencing data by estimating multiple shrinkage priors.
Van De Wiel MA; Leday GG; Pardo L; Rue H; Van Der Vaart AW; Van Wieringen WN
Biostatistics; 2013 Jan; 14(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 22988280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bayesian variable selection method for censored survival data.
Faraggi D; Simon R
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1475-85. PubMed ID: 9883546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Naive Bayesian-based nomogram for prediction of prostate cancer recurrence.
Demsar J; Zupan B; Kattan MW; Beck JR; Bratko I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():436-41. PubMed ID: 10724923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robustness of compound Dirichlet priors for Bayesian inference of branch lengths.
Zhang C; Rannala B; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 22328570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.
Xu C; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2134-2161. PubMed ID: 36964996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bayesian analyses of time-interval data for environmental radiation monitoring.
Luo P; Sharp JL; DeVol TA
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 23192083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
Laubender RP; Bender R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Likelihood ratio and a Bayesian approach were superior to standard noninferiority analysis when the noninferiority margin varied with the control event rate.
Kim MY; Xue X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1253-61. PubMed ID: 15617951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variable selection in semiparametric cure models based on penalized likelihood, with application to breast cancer clinical trials.
Liu X; Peng Y; Tu D; Liang H
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2882-91. PubMed ID: 22733695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
