222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23566600)
1. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations.
Nayyar N; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 23566600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone.
Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Martin WC; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24360007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CAD/CAM implant abutments using coded healing abutments: a detailed description of the restorative process.
Mahn DH; Prestipino T
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):612-5. PubMed ID: 24564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for registering the abutment screw position of cement-retained implant restorations.
Figueras-Alvarez O; Cedeño R; Cano-Batalla J; Cabratosa-Termes J
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20620369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of CAD/CAM to fabricate duplicate abutments for retrofitting an existing implant prosthesis: a clinical report.
Kim C; Kim JY; Lim YJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 24725613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.
Baig MR; Rajan G
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20553176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for fabrication of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O; Deli G
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24914913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
Ramsey CD; Ritter RG
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 23025311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of healing abutments for the fabrication of cement-retained, implant-supported provisional prostheses.
Proussaefs P
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 11941363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing abutments for cement retained implant supported restorations.
Chee W; Jivraj S
Br Dent J; 2006 Nov; 201(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 17099660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented or screw-retained implant restorations: how do you decide?
Small BW
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21613034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
