BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23566610)

  • 21. An alternate treatment method for a fixed-detachable hybrid prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Cobb GW; Metcalf AM; Parsell D; Reeves GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 12644797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cement-retained bar attachment system for implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Ozcelik TB; Ozcelik O; Pektas ZO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 17547953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations.
    Nayyar N; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 23566600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CAD/CAM-fabricated template for locating implant abutment screws in cement-retained anatomic zirconia restorations.
    Lee DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 26013067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for restoring facially inclined implants with a screw-retained restoration.
    Takanashi K; Lee JM; Sedler A; Aalam AK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 23566609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures with locator attachments.
    Uludag B; Cogalan K; Polat S
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):451-3. PubMed ID: 20557148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs.
    Guichet DL; Caputo AA; Choi H; Sorensen JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 10795456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening.
    Assenza B; Scarano A; Leghissa G; Carusi G; Thams U; Roman FS; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 16265854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A method for determining the position of the abutment screw of any cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Figueras-Alvarez O; Real-Voltas F; Cabratosa-Termes J; Roig M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):846-848. PubMed ID: 32576371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An alternative multiple pontic design for a fixed implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del Castillo R; Ercoli C; Delgado JC; Alcaraz J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 21889007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method for registering the abutment screw position of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Figueras-Alvarez O; CedeƱo R; Cano-Batalla J; Cabratosa-Termes J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20620369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.
    Assenza B; Tripodi D; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; D'Ercole S
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 21780904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.