115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2356719)
1. Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25.
Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():120-7. PubMed ID: 2356719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wearable Digital Speech Processor for Cochlear Implants Using a TMS320C25.
Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):120-127. PubMed ID: 31905530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ultra-low-power programmable analog bionic ear processor.
Sarpeshkar R; Salthouse C; Sit JJ; Baker MW; Zhak SM; Lu TK; Turicchia L; Balster S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):711-27. PubMed ID: 15825873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Algorithms, hardware, and software for a digital signal processor microcomputer-based speech processor in a multielectrode cochlear implant system.
Morris LR; Barszczewski P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Jun; 36(6):573-84. PubMed ID: 2731944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [CILAB--a PC-based laboratory speech processor for implementation and evaluation of new stimulation strategies for cochlear implants].
Mitterbacher A; Lampacher P; Zierhofer C; Hochmair E
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):146-52. PubMed ID: 15279463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A software tool for analyzing multichannel cochlear implant signals.
Lai WK; Bögli H; Dillier N
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):380-91. PubMed ID: 14534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea.
Kim KH; Choi SJ; Kim JH; Kim DH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 19272890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor.
Weiss MR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 8263822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A versatile system for the generation and the development of speech coding strategies in cochlear implants.
Tönder N; Hartmann R; Klinke R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jun; 45(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 9609942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results for the DIGISONIC multichannel cochlear implant.
Chouard CH; Meyer B; Fugain C; Koca O
Laryngoscope; 1995 May; 105(5 Pt 1):505-9. PubMed ID: 7760667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design for a simplified cochlear implant system.
An SK; Park SI; Jun SB; Lee CJ; Byun KM; Sung JH; Wilson BS; Rebscher SJ; Oh SH; Kim SJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 1):973-82. PubMed ID: 17554817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A low-power asynchronous interleaved sampling algorithm for cochlear implants that encodes envelope and phase information.
Sit JJ; Simonson AM; Oxenham AJ; Faltys MA; Sarpeshkar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 17260865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of the clinic results of speech processing strategies and latest advances on cochlear implant].
Guan T; Ye D
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 23(5):1138-41. PubMed ID: 17121372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
