These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2356738)

  • 1. Residual hearing capacity of severely hearing-impaired subjects.
    Lamoré PJ; Verweij C; Brocaar MP
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():7-15. PubMed ID: 2356738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual Hearing Capacity of Severely Hearing-impaired Subjects.
    Lamoré PJJ; Verweij C; Brocaar MP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):7-15. PubMed ID: 31905505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Relations between pure-tone threshold and discrimination of monosyllables in inner ear high-frequency hearing disorders].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1984 Feb; 32(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6706703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigations of the residual hearing capacity of severely hearing-impaired and profoundly deaf subjects.
    Lamoré PJ; Verweij C; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1985; 24(5):343-61. PubMed ID: 4051883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise.
    Houtgast T; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):287-95. PubMed ID: 18569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Alterations of speech audiometry in presbycusis brought about by cochlear acoustic emissions].
    Bonfils P
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Aug; 17(5):207-10. PubMed ID: 3216441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tone-glide discrimination: normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Collins MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 6482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic neuromas presenting with normal or symmetrical hearing: factors associated with diagnosis and outcome.
    Lustig LR; Rifkin S; Jackler RK; Pitts LH
    Am J Otol; 1998 Mar; 19(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 9520059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment.
    Rosen S; Faulkner A; Smith DA
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():16-22. PubMed ID: 2356723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.