These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2356741)

  • 1. Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids.
    Peterson PM; Wei SM; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():85-90. PubMed ID: 2356741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness of an Adaptive Beamforming Method for Hearing Aids.
    Peterson PM; Wei SM; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):85-90. PubMed ID: 31905525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimicrophone adaptive beamforming for interference reduction in hearing aids.
    Peterson PM; Durlach NI; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):103-10. PubMed ID: 3430369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid.
    Weiss M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids.
    Greenberg JE; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1662-76. PubMed ID: 1564202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems.
    Srinivasan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intelligibility in noise using multimicrophone hearing aids.
    Lurquin P; Rafhay S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1996; 50(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 8767253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manikin and cochlear implant patient test results with a portable adaptive beamforming processor to suppress the effects of noise.
    van Hoesel RJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():144-6. PubMed ID: 7668608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a signal cancellation technique involving impulse response to assess directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3214-26. PubMed ID: 20000935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The status of hearing aid technology from the audiologic viewpoint].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1988 Sep; 36(9):377-82. PubMed ID: 3049479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal processing for hearing impairment.
    Levitt H; Bakke M; Kates J; Neuman A; Schwander T; Weiss M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():7-19. PubMed ID: 8153567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.