BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23568338)

  • 1. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
    Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation system for understanding the lag effect in fluoroscopic images.
    Tanaka R; Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 23271447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy.
    Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Mori S; Dobashi S; Kumagai M; Kawashima H; Minohara S; Sanada S
    J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 21030796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
    Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
    Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.
    Shi L; Lu M; Bennett NR; Shapiro E; Zhang J; Colbeth R; Star-Lack J; Wang AS
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3332-3343. PubMed ID: 32347561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Onishi SK
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72. PubMed ID: 15259649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
    Sakai S; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.