149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23568338)
21. Evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope (MAF) using generalized system performance metrics.
Jain A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031915. PubMed ID: 23464330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Effect on image data resampling in evaluation of the basic imaging properties for a digital radiographic system based on a flat panel detector].
Katayama R; Sakai S; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Takada K; Hayabuchi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 17917336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope: A high-resolution region-of-interest x-ray imager.
Jain A; Bednarek DR; Ionita C; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4112-26. PubMed ID: 21859012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
Gopal A; Samant SS
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Campanini R; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Danielli C; Angelini L; Maggi S
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method.
Maruyama S
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1461-1468. PubMed ID: 33151466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation.
Ning R; Chen B; Yu R; Conover D; Tang X; Ning Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Sep; 19(9):949-63. PubMed ID: 11127608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of image lag in a flat-panel, detector-equipped cardiovascular X-ray machine using a newly developed dynamic phantom.
Sato H; Kondo K; Kato K; Nakazawa Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5213. PubMed ID: 26103192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A moving slanted-edge method to measure the temporal modulation transfer function of fluoroscopic systems.
Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2473-84. PubMed ID: 18649480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
Marshall NW; Smet M; Hofmans M; Pauwels H; De Clercq T; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Therapy imaging: a signal-to-noise analysis of a fluoroscopic imaging system for radiotherapy localization.
Munro P; Rawlinson JA; Fenster A
Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):763-72. PubMed ID: 2233562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
